Module aws_sdk_workmail::types
source · Expand description
Data structures used by operation inputs/outputs.
Modules
- Builders
- Error types that Amazon WorkMail can respond with.
Structs
A rule that controls access to an WorkMail organization.
List all the
AvailabilityConfiguration
's for the given WorkMail organization.At least one delegate must be associated to the resource to disable automatic replies from the resource.
The name of the attribute, which is one of the values defined in the UserAttribute enumeration.
A DNS record uploaded to your DNS provider.
The domain to associate with an WorkMail organization.
Describes an EWS based availability provider. This is only used as input to the service.
The configuration applied to an organization's folders by its retention policy.
The representation of an WorkMail group.
The impersonation rule that matched the input.
An impersonation role for the given WorkMail organization.
The rules for the given impersonation role.
Describes a Lambda based availability provider.
The data for a given domain.
The details of a mailbox export job, including the user or resource ID associated with the mailbox and the S3 bucket that the mailbox contents are exported to.
The representation of a user or group.
The rule that a simulated user matches.
The override object.
A rule that controls access to mobile devices for an WorkMail group.
The representation of an organization.
Permission granted to a user, group, or resource to access a certain aspect of another user, group, or resource mailbox.
Describes an EWS based availability provider when returned from the service. It does not contain the password of the endpoint.
The representation of a resource.
Describes a tag applied to a resource.
The representation of an WorkMail user.
Enums
- When writing a match expression against
AccessControlRuleEffect
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
AccessEffect
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
AvailabilityProviderType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
DnsRecordVerificationStatus
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
EntityState
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
FolderName
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
ImpersonationRoleType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
MailboxExportJobState
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
MemberType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
MobileDeviceAccessRuleEffect
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
PermissionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
ResourceType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
RetentionAction
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
UserRole
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.