Skip to main content

aver/ir/
proof_ir.rs

1//! Proof intermediate representation.
2//!
3//! Single decision substrate the Lean and Dafny proof exporters
4//! consume. Backends render text from a fully-resolved `ProofIR` —
5//! they do not classify shapes, do not derive contracts, do not
6//! decide between native and fuel emit. Every decision happens once
7//! in the `proof_lower` pipeline stage; both backends see the same
8//! decision and either render it consistently or fail consistently.
9//!
10//! Replaces the ad-hoc "guess and emit" pattern that grew across
11//! `src/codegen/{common,recursion,lean,dafny}` during 0.22.0 with a
12//! single typed model. Each variant that says "emit native" or
13//! "lift to subtype" carries inside its payload everything the
14//! backend needs and everything the classifier proved — the type
15//! system makes it impossible to produce a "native" decision
16//! without also producing the side-conditions that justify it.
17//!
18//! Coverage today: `refined_types` (refinement-via-opaque records),
19//! `fn_contracts` (per-pure-fn recursion shape), `law_theorems`
20//! (per-verify-law strategy + quantifier + claim decomposition).
21//!
22//! ## Invariant after #147 phase E PR 12 Scope A
23//!
24//! - **Backend-facing IR fields are resolved.** Every
25//!   `Spanned<...>` on this module's public structs carries
26//!   [`crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr`], not raw `ast::Expr`.
27//!   `proof_lower::populate_*` resolves at the producer site through
28//!   the symbol table under the correct scope (entry / dep-module
29//!   prefix); backends walk the resolved form directly via
30//!   `emit_expr`, no `emit_expr_legacy` adapter for IR-sourced
31//!   expressions.
32//! - **Identity-sensitive decisions use typed IDs.**
33//!   `fn_contracts` is keyed by [`FnId`] (not bare name);
34//!   `refined_types` is keyed by [`TypeId`]; `law_theorems` carry
35//!   the target fn's `FnId`. The Lean/Dafny native-guarded rewriter
36//!   pins target by `FnId` (via `fn_id_for_decl`), not bare name —
37//!   regression-pinned by
38//!   `proof_export_module_owned_native_guarded_resolves_correct_fn_id`.
39//! - **`proof_lower` internal AST discovery is intentional.**
40//!   The classifier's pattern matchers still walk raw `ast::Expr`
41//!   inside this stage. Source-pattern matching is the natural
42//!   shape for the discovery work (refinement carrier search,
43//!   `Map.set` axiom detection, spec-equivalence comparison); a
44//!   resolved walker would be the same logic spelled in a different
45//!   enum. Identity-sensitive sites that COULD leak across scope
46//!   were audited and are bounded today by:
47//!     1. `vb.fn_name` parses as a single `Ident` (verify blocks
48//!        target entry-only fns by current grammar)
49//!     2. Builtin matchers (`"Bool.and"`, `"Map.set"`, …) compare
50//!        global namespace methods that have no per-scope identity.
51//! - **Full `ResolvedProofLowerView` + semantic matcher API is
52//!   deferred** until a real trigger lands: module-scoped verify
53//!   blocks, dotted verify targets / laws over dep-module fns, LSP
54//!   rename, inliner / monomorphizer / cross-scope transforms. Each
55//!   of those unbounds the "entry-only" assumption above. When it
56//!   ships, the right architecture is a typed
57//!   `ProofLowerInputs::resolved_fn_view(fd)` + matcher helpers
58//!   (`callee_is_builtin`, `callee_is_fn(fn_id)`, `ctor_is`,
59//!   `ident_name`, `int_lit`) — not a mechanical
60//!   `Expr -> ResolvedExpr` rewrite of the discovery walkers.
61
62use std::collections::HashMap;
63
64use crate::ast::Spanned;
65
66// Identity keys for named declarations crossing module boundaries
67// (`FnKey`, `TypeKey`, `LawKey`) live in `crate::ir::identity` —
68// they're general identity primitives, not proof-specific. Today's
69// proof flow is where the bare-string bug class first surfaced
70// (reviewer rounds 5/6), but other backends with multi-module emit
71// (VM, Rust codegen, WASM) will reach for the same types when they
72// hit the same bug class. Re-exported here for ergonomics.
73pub use crate::ir::identity::{CtorId, FnId, FnKey, LawKey, ModuleId, TypeId, TypeKey};
74
75/// Output of the `proof_lower` pipeline stage. Every decision the
76/// proof backends will make is materialised here; backends become
77/// pure renderers.
78///
79/// `ProofIR` is intentionally NOT a closed superset of the AST — it
80/// only carries facts that proof export needs. Source-faithful
81/// emission of plain fns / verify cases still flows through the
82/// untyped AST path, same as runtime backends (VM, Rust, WASM).
83#[derive(Debug, Clone, Default)]
84pub struct ProofIR {
85    /// Every refinement-lifted user type, keyed by opaque [`TypeId`]
86    /// from the symbol table. Same-bare-name refined records in two
87    /// modules (`A.Natural` vs `B.Natural`) get distinct IDs, so
88    /// their predicates never merge. Includes types declared in the
89    /// entry items and in dependent modules; name resolution happens
90    /// once in `populate_refined_types`, consumers look up directly
91    /// by id through `ctx.symbol_table`.
92    pub refined_types: HashMap<TypeId, RefinedTypeDecl>,
93    /// Per-pure-fn contract describing what proof artifact the fn
94    /// lowers to (native / fuel / structural / linear recurrence).
95    /// Keyed by opaque [`FnId`] from the symbol table — name
96    /// resolution happens once in `populate_fn_contracts`;
97    /// consumers thereafter use `ctx.symbol_table` to resolve
98    /// `&FnDef → FnId` and look up directly. Cross-module
99    /// same-bare-name fns get distinct IDs, so the lookup is
100    /// unambiguous without per-call-site scope plumbing.
101    pub fn_contracts: HashMap<FnId, FnContract>,
102    /// Per-verify-law theorem decomposed into quantifiers, premises,
103    /// and claim with all wrapper-strip / val-projection / drop-vs-
104    /// keep decisions baked in, plus the pinned proof strategy.
105    pub law_theorems: Vec<LawTheorem>,
106    /// Recursive pure fns whose shape fell outside every recognised
107    /// pattern. Surfaced as diagnostics ("recursive function 'foo'
108    /// is outside proof subset (...)") and steers the consumer to
109    /// either skip the fn or emit it as a partial/axiom fallback.
110    /// Carried in ProofIR so consumers don't re-run the classifier
111    /// just to see what failed.
112    pub unclassified_fns: Vec<UnclassifiedFn>,
113}
114
115/// A recursive pure fn the contract classifier couldn't match against
116/// any supported shape. Carries the source line + a human-readable
117/// reason string so backends can render a diagnostic without
118/// inventing prose.
119#[derive(Debug, Clone, Eq, PartialEq)]
120pub struct UnclassifiedFn {
121    pub line: usize,
122    pub message: String,
123}
124
125/// Refinement smart-constructor guard a `SimpOmegaUnfold` strategy
126/// found in the law's fn unfold chain. `param` is the smart
127/// constructor's input parameter name; `predicate` is the Bool
128/// subject of its `match true/false → Ok/Err` body. Backends emit
129/// `by_cases h_<v> : <substituted predicate>` for each law-given by
130/// rewriting `param` to `<v>` inside the predicate.
131#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
132pub struct SmartGuard {
133    pub param: String,
134    pub predicate: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
135}
136
137/// A refinement-lifted user type — opaque record with a single
138/// carrier field, paired with a validating smart constructor. The
139/// presence of this decl in `ProofIR.refined_types` is the
140/// decision: "emit this as a subtype on Lean and a subset type on
141/// Dafny". Backends never re-decide.
142#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
143pub struct RefinedTypeDecl {
144    /// Source-level type name (e.g. `"Natural"`). NOT canonicalised
145    /// — backends emit using the source name; canonical form is the
146    /// map key.
147    pub name: String,
148    /// Carrier annotation from the record's single field (typically
149    /// `"Int"`). Drives the Lean Subtype underlying type and the
150    /// Dafny subset type's base.
151    pub carrier_type: String,
152    /// Carrier-field source name (e.g. `"value"`). Lean uses `.val`
153    /// to project Subtype values regardless of source name; Dafny's
154    /// subset binds the source name in its predicate.
155    pub carrier_field: String,
156    /// Smart constructor's input parameter name (e.g. `"n"`) — the
157    /// invariant predicate's free variable.
158    pub predicate_param: String,
159    /// Bool predicate that every value of the refined type must
160    /// satisfy, in terms of `predicate_param`. Comes from the smart
161    /// constructor's `match <pred> { true -> Ok(...); false -> Err(...)
162    /// }` subject.
163    pub invariant: Predicate,
164    /// Inhabitation witness: a literal value of `carrier_type` that
165    /// the lowerer verified satisfies `invariant`. Resolved by first
166    /// trying the smart constructor's verify block (`fromX(K) =>
167    /// Ok(...)` for some literal K — verified by the user via
168    /// `aver verify`), then evaluating the predicate against small
169    /// candidates as a fallback.
170    ///
171    /// Why the IR carries this even though only Dafny's subset type
172    /// strictly *requires* a non-emptiness witness: it's a fact
173    /// about the type (∃ v : carrier, invariant(v) holds), not a
174    /// Dafny-specific syntactic obligation. Backends use it as they
175    /// see fit:
176    ///
177    /// - Dafny: emits `type X = v: int | P v witness <W>`. Required
178    ///   for the subset type to be inhabited and elaborable.
179    /// - Lean: currently unused — propositional `Subtype` may be
180    ///   empty, so `{ v : Int // P v }` elaborates regardless. Step
181    ///   N+1 could emit a `def sample_X : X := ⟨W, by decide⟩` for
182    ///   roundtrip / test convenience.
183    /// - Future Z3 / Coq / etc.: same fact, rendered per target.
184    ///
185    /// `None` when no satisfier was found. Backends that require a
186    /// witness must either reject the type or fall back to a target-
187    /// default (Dafny picks `0` and crosses fingers).
188    pub witness: Option<String>,
189}
190
191/// Per-pure-fn proof contract — what recursion shape (if any) the
192/// lowerer pinned for emit.
193#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
194pub struct FnContract {
195    pub source_name: String,
196    /// `None` means non-recursive (plain emit). `Some` says native /
197    /// fuel / structural / whatever the lowerer decided, with all
198    /// side-conditions inlined.
199    pub recursion: Option<RecursionContract>,
200}
201
202/// Recursion-shape decision. Each variant carries everything its
203/// emit needs AND the side-conditions the lowerer proved to choose
204/// it. The variants intentionally cannot be constructed without
205/// their side-conditions — backends cannot render `Native` without
206/// the lowerer having proved preservation + decrease.
207#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
208pub enum RecursionContract {
209    /// Fuel-encoded fallback. No side-conditions to prove; works
210    /// for any shape the classifier accepted as recursive.
211    Fuel {
212        /// Symbolic measure feeding the wrapper (`natAbs n + 1`,
213        /// `|xs| + 1`, etc.). Backends translate per target.
214        fuel_metric: FuelMetric,
215    },
216    /// Affine second-order linear recurrence on `Int`, shape
217    /// `f(n) = a*f(n-1) + b*f(n-2)` with literal `0`/`1` base cases
218    /// and an `n < 0` guard. Lowered to a private Nat pair-state
219    /// worker (Lean / Dafny both emit native structural recursion on
220    /// the Nat counter, no fuel). The lowerer doesn't carry the
221    /// shape coefficients yet — backends still pattern-match the
222    /// fn body via `lean::recurrence::detect_second_order_int_
223    /// linear_recurrence`. Step N+1 could materialise them here.
224    LinearRecurrence2,
225    /// Native recursion with explicit precondition. Lowerer proved
226    /// both `preservation` (rec args stay in domain) and `decrease`
227    /// (measure strictly drops) before constructing this variant.
228    /// Currently specialised to the IntCountdown-literal-zero shape
229    /// (`match p { 0 -> BASE; _ -> rec(p-1, ...) }`); other native-
230    /// recursion shapes (e.g. linear recurrence on a pair-state
231    /// worker) will land as additional `RecursionContract` variants.
232    Native {
233        /// Conjunction of precondition clauses, kept as a vector so
234        /// backends can render one `requires` per clause (Dafny) or
235        /// fold into a single `&&` chain (Lean). Empty means "no
236        /// caller-derived precondition" — the backend synthesises a
237        /// fibTR-style default (`param ≥ 0`) at emit time.
238        precondition: Vec<Predicate>,
239        /// Symbolic measure (e.g. `natAbs(n)`). Backends render per
240        /// target language (`Int.natAbs n` on Lean, `n` with a
241        /// `requires n >= 0` clause on Dafny).
242        measure: Measure,
243        /// Side-condition tag: lowerer attests the recursive args
244        /// preserve the precondition. Empty enum payload — its
245        /// existence in the type is the proof, not its content.
246        preservation: PreservationProof,
247        /// Same for the decreasing measure.
248        decrease: DecreaseProof,
249        /// Body decomposition for the IntCountdown-literal-zero shape:
250        /// the literal int that selects the base arm, the base arm's
251        /// body, and the wildcard arm's body. Carried so backends can
252        /// render the `if h : p = <lit> then base else rec(p-1, ...)`
253        /// switch without re-walking the source AST. The literal is
254        /// always `0` today — the `IntCountdownLiteralZero`
255        /// preservation marker attests it; carrying the value as data
256        /// keeps the IR shape forward-compatible with future
257        /// preservation proofs that admit other literals.
258        body: NativeIntCountdownBody,
259    },
260    /// Well-founded native def on `param.toNat` — graduates a fn out
261    /// of the fuel/partial encoding so it stays kernel-transparent
262    /// (Lean: `termination_by param.toNat` + a `decreasing_by` the
263    /// kernel re-checks; Dafny: `decreases if param >= 0 then param
264    /// else 0` with NO synthesized `requires`, so total callers stay
265    /// wellformed). Two validated sources:
266    ///
267    /// - `floor_div: Some(..)` — every self-call shrinks `param` by a
268    ///   literal-divisor floor division
269    ///   (`Result.withDefault(Int.div(p, k), d)` with literal k >= 2,
270    ///   possibly through a unary wrapper fn), and the classifier
271    ///   verified the guard chain enclosing every self-call site
272    ///   implies `p >= 1` — so `p / k < p` and the measure strictly
273    ///   drops. Never guessed: a fn whose guards don't justify the
274    ///   shrink keeps its prior (partial/opaque) emission.
275    /// - `floor_div: None` — guard-protected subtractive countdown
276    ///   (`p - k`, literal k >= 1, guards imply `p >= 1`), graduated
277    ///   out of fuel on demand by the floor-division window law
278    ///   family, whose proof templates need the fn's defining
279    ///   equations and functional-induction principle.
280    WellFoundedToNat {
281        /// The decreasing Int parameter (source name).
282        param: String,
283        /// `Some` for the floor-division shrink; `None` for the
284        /// guarded subtractive countdown.
285        floor_div: Option<FloorDivShrink>,
286    },
287}
288
289/// Payload of [`RecursionContract::WellFoundedToNat`] for the
290/// floor-division shrink shape.
291#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
292pub struct FloorDivShrink {
293    /// The literal divisor (>= 2).
294    pub divisor: i64,
295    /// `Some(name)` when the self-call shrinks through a unary
296    /// wrapper fn whose body is exactly
297    /// `Result.withDefault(Int.div(x, divisor), <int literal>)`;
298    /// `None` when the `Result.withDefault(Int.div(p, k), d)` call
299    /// is inlined at the self-call site. Lean's `decreasing_by`
300    /// unfolds the wrapper by name.
301    pub helper_fn: Option<String>,
302}
303
304/// Body decomposition for the `IntCountdown-literal-zero` native
305/// shape. Each field is a slice of the source AST the lowerer
306/// extracted while classifying; backends render them directly
307/// without re-walking the source.
308#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
309pub struct NativeIntCountdownBody {
310    /// The literal int that selects the base arm. Always `0` today;
311    /// future preservation proofs may admit other literals, so the
312    /// value is carried as data rather than baked into the marker.
313    pub base_arm_literal: i64,
314    /// AST for the base arm's body (`match p { 0 -> THIS; _ -> ... }`).
315    pub base_arm_body: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
316    /// AST for the wildcard arm's body — the recursive call site.
317    pub wildcard_arm_body: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
318}
319
320/// Fuel metric for the fallback fuel-encoded emit path.
321#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
322pub enum FuelMetric {
323    /// `n.natAbs + 1` — classic IntCountdown fuel.
324    NatAbsPlusOne { param: String },
325    /// `(bound - n).natAbs + 1` — IntAscending: param climbs toward
326    /// a bound expression. Backends render the bound through their
327    /// own `Spanned<Expr>` emitter (Lean: `bound_expr_to_lean`,
328    /// Dafny: `emit_expr` over int subset).
329    BoundMinusParamNatAbsPlusOne {
330        param: String,
331        bound: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
332    },
333    /// `xs.length + 1` — List/String structural recursion.
334    SeqLenPlusOne { param: String },
335    /// `sizeOf(x) + 1` — structural recursion on a user-defined
336    /// recursive ADT (e.g. `Term::App(f, arg)`). The classifier
337    /// doesn't pin the bound param — sizeOf walks the whole call
338    /// frame — so this variant carries no param name.
339    SizeOfPlusOne,
340    /// `s.length - pos` — StringPosAdvance: a `String` carrier stays
341    /// invariant, an `Int` position climbs toward its length.
342    StringLenMinusPos {
343        string_param: String,
344        pos_param: String,
345    },
346    /// Lexicographic pair for mutual recursion SCCs.
347    Lex { params: Vec<String>, rank: usize },
348}
349
350/// Symbolic termination measure. Backend-agnostic.
351#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
352pub enum Measure {
353    NatAbsInt { param: String },
354    SeqLen { param: String },
355    Lex(Vec<Measure>),
356}
357
358/// Marker that the lowerer constructed a proof of preservation
359/// (recursive args stay in the precondition's domain). The variants
360/// describe HOW the proof was constructed so future maintainers can
361/// trace why a given shape was accepted as native.
362#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
363pub enum PreservationProof {
364    /// `match p { 0 -> base; _ -> rec(p-1, ...) }` under `p ≥ 0`
365    /// precondition. Wildcard arm gives `p ≠ 0`, combined with
366    /// `p ≥ 0` yields `p ≥ 1`, so `p - 1 ≥ 0`.
367    IntCountdownLiteralZero,
368}
369
370/// Symmetric marker for the decreasing measure.
371#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
372pub enum DecreaseProof {
373    /// `natAbs(p - 1) < natAbs(p)` under `p ≥ 0 ∧ p ≠ 0`.
374    NatAbsCountdown,
375}
376
377/// Lowered verify-law theorem. All projection decisions (`.val`
378/// vs bare ident, wrapper strip, when-keep vs when-drop) are
379/// already baked into the fields below; backends render directly.
380#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
381pub struct LawTheorem {
382    /// Opaque identity of the fn this law targets, resolved through
383    /// `SymbolTable` at populate time (phase E3). Verify laws are
384    /// entry-only per the current model, so this is effectively
385    /// always an entry-scope `FnId` today; once laws-in-modules
386    /// lands the same `FnId` will distinguish two same-bare-name
387    /// recursive fns across modules without any per-callsite scope
388    /// plumbing.
389    pub fn_id: FnId,
390    pub law_name: String,
391    pub quantifiers: Vec<Quantifier>,
392    /// Premises in order. Already includes `when` if it carries
393    /// information beyond the refinement invariants (the lowerer
394    /// performs the bijective syntactic equivalence check).
395    pub premises: Vec<Predicate>,
396    /// LHS = RHS claim. Wrapper-stripped, lifted-var-aware (bare
397    /// idents for arg positions, `.val` projections inside
398    /// comparator BinOps if the lowerer determined this is needed).
399    pub claim_lhs: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
400    pub claim_rhs: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
401    pub strategy: ProofStrategy,
402}
403
404/// A universally-quantified variable in a law theorem. Carries
405/// enough type info for backends to render the binder correctly
406/// (`(a : Natural)` for refined Int, `(a : Int)` for plain int,
407/// `(rng : RandomIntInBounds)` for oracle).
408#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
409pub struct Quantifier {
410    pub name: String,
411    pub binder_type: QuantifierType,
412}
413
414#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
415pub enum QuantifierType {
416    /// Plain Aver type, rendered as-is on each backend.
417    Plain(String),
418    /// Refinement-lifted: source declared `given a: Int`, body used
419    /// `Natural(value = a)`, so the quantifier binds at the refined
420    /// type. The carried `refined_type` key looks up in
421    /// `ProofIR.refined_types`.
422    RefinedTo { refined_type: String },
423    /// Oracle subtype: classified Generative-shape effect-givens
424    /// bind oracles wrapped in a subtype carrier
425    /// (`RandomIntInBounds`, `RandomFloatInUnit`,
426    /// `TimeUnixMsNonneg`).
427    OracleSubtype(String),
428}
429
430/// Algebraic / proof-theoretic shape of a verify-law theorem.
431///
432/// **Naming rule**: variants describe **what the law says**, not
433/// **how a backend proves it**. The IR is target-agnostic — Lean
434/// maps `Commutative { op: Add }` to `simp [fn, Int.add_comm]`,
435/// Dafny maps the same variant to its own lemma vocabulary, a Z3
436/// backend could ship a different tactic again. Tactic names
437/// (`SimpOverLemmas`, `simp+omega`) do not appear in variant names;
438/// `LinearArithmetic` is named for the semantic, not the tactic.
439#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
440pub enum ProofStrategy {
441    /// `rfl` / definitional equality — `lhs ≡ rhs` syntactically.
442    Reflexive,
443    /// `simp` chain over named lemmas. The discovery feedback loop
444    /// (`lemma_discovery::committed`) pins this when a committed
445    /// `DiscoveredLemmas.lean` holds kernel-proved lemmas in-scope
446    /// for an `Induction` law: the names are the discovered theorem
447    /// names, and the Lean renderer reuses the induction ladder with
448    /// those lemmas embedded + joined to its simp sets. Pinned by
449    /// the CLI (post-lowering re-pin), never by
450    /// `classify_law_strategy` — discovery feedback is opt-in via
451    /// the committed artifact.
452    SimpOverLemmas(Vec<String>),
453    /// `∀ a b, f(a, b) = f(b, a)` — commutativity of the law's fn,
454    /// whose body reduces to `a <op> b`. The `op` tag lets backends
455    /// pick their own lemma vocabulary (Lean: `Int.add_comm`,
456    /// Dafny: built-in arithmetic axioms).
457    Commutative { op: crate::ast::BinOp },
458    /// `∀ a b c, f(f(a,b),c) = f(a,f(b,c))` — associativity of `f`.
459    Associative { op: crate::ast::BinOp },
460    /// `∀ a, f(a, e) = a` (or the swapped `f(e, a) = a`) — the
461    /// identity-element law for the underlying op (`e` = `0` for
462    /// Add / Sub, `1` for Mul). Backends emit `simp [fn]` (the
463    /// wrapper's body unfolds to the identity equation, which simp
464    /// closes); the variant doesn't need a `side` field because
465    /// the emit is symmetric — Sub is naturally one-sided (only
466    /// right-identity), Add/Mul accept either side. The lowerer
467    /// guarantees the law's actual shape matches the op's identity
468    /// behaviour before pinning.
469    IdentityElement { op: crate::ast::BinOp },
470    /// `∀ a b, f(a, b) = -f(b, a)` (or the swapped negation).
471    /// `neg_on_rhs` records which side carries the `-` wrap so
472    /// backends with directional lemmas (Lean's `Int.neg_sub b a :
473    /// -(b - a) = a - b`) can flip via `.symm` correctly.
474    AntiCommutative {
475        op: crate::ast::BinOp,
476        /// `true` for `f(a, b) = -f(b, a)` (negation on rhs);
477        /// `false` for the swapped arrangement.
478        neg_on_rhs: bool,
479    },
480    /// `∀ a, g(a) = f(a, c)` or `f(c, a)` — the unary fn `g` is
481    /// the binary fn `f` with one argument bound to constant `c`.
482    /// Backends unfold both fns to expose the underlying op; the
483    /// IR carries `inner_fn` (the binary's source name) so the
484    /// unfold list is unambiguous.
485    UnaryEqualsBinary {
486        /// Source-level name of the binary fn the unary one equals.
487        inner_fn: String,
488    },
489    /// "Linear arithmetic over an unfold chain" — the law's two
490    /// sides reduce to a flat linear equation on Int once every
491    /// reachable user fn is unfolded. Generic catch-all for Int
492    /// laws that don't fit a named algebraic property. The IR
493    /// captures the unfold list + wrapper-return signal +
494    /// refinement smart-constructor guard; backends translate to
495    /// their decision procedure (Lean: `simp + omega`, Dafny: Z3
496    /// linear int prover). Named for the **semantic** ("linear
497    /// arithmetic"), not the Lean tactic.
498    LinearArithmetic {
499        /// Ordered fn unfold list. Top-level law fn first — Lean's
500        /// `unfold` resolves left-to-right and the call layer the
501        /// tactic peels at each step must match the goal shape.
502        unfold_fns: Vec<String>,
503        /// `true` when at least one fn in `unfold_fns` returns a
504        /// wrapper (Result, Option, …). Drives extra case-split
505        /// machinery in the emit — pure linear-arithmetic provers
506        /// can't close constructor-equality goals, so the wrapper
507        /// case splits on the smart-constructor guard first.
508        wrapper_return: bool,
509        /// Smart-constructor guard pulled from a refinement
510        /// `fromX(p: Int) -> Result<X, _>` in the unfold chain.
511        /// `Some` when one was found; `None` falls back to a
512        /// conservative `(n ≥ 0)` default when `wrapper_return`
513        /// forces case-splitting.
514        smart_guard: Option<SmartGuard>,
515        /// `true` when at least one law given is lifted to a
516        /// refinement type (`given a: Int` used as `Refined(value
517        /// = a)` in the law body). The Subtype/subset lift carries
518        /// the invariant in the type, so the by_cases case-split
519        /// that `wrapper_return` would otherwise force is
520        /// unnecessary — backends emit a plain unfold + simp
521        /// against arithmetic lemmas.
522        lifted: bool,
523    },
524    /// Structural induction on a recursive ADT parameter.
525    Induction { param: String },
526    /// Library axiom instance — the law instantiates a named
527    /// data-structure axiom (e.g. AverMap's `has_set_self` or
528    /// `get_set_self`). Backends map the axiom name to their
529    /// lemma vocabulary (Lean: `AverMap.has_set_self`; Dafny:
530    /// its own set/lookup axioms; Z3: built-in array theory).
531    /// Args carry the call-site expressions the axiom applies to.
532    LibraryAxiom {
533        /// Canonical axiom name. Recognised values today:
534        /// `"Map.has_set_self"`, `"Map.get_set_self"`. Open string
535        /// so future axioms (List, Set, Array, …) extend without
536        /// enum churn.
537        axiom: String,
538        /// Arguments in the order the axiom expects. For Map
539        /// axioms: `[m, k, v]` (the map, key, value the axiom
540        /// reasons about).
541        args: Vec<Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>>,
542    },
543    /// Post-condition of an inline-defined map-update fn. The outer
544    /// fn `outer(m, k)` has body shape `let v = Map.get m k; match v
545    /// { Some(_) -> Map.set m k _; None -> Map.set m k _ }` — i.e. it
546    /// inspects the existing value and writes some new value at key
547    /// `k` in every arm. The law asserts a post-condition on that
548    /// update — `Map.has(outer(m, k), k) == true` (`HasAfter`), or
549    /// `Map.get(outer(m, k), k) == Option.Some(...)` (`GetAfter`).
550    ///
551    /// Backends emit a 2-step proof: unfold the outer fn, case-split
552    /// on `Map.get m k` (the same value `outer` inspected), apply the
553    /// `Map.set`-axioms on each branch. Named after the law's
554    /// algebraic content, not the Lean tactic.
555    MapUpdatePostcondition {
556        /// Source name of the outer update fn.
557        outer_fn: String,
558        /// Which post-condition the law asserts.
559        kind: MapUpdatePostconditionKind,
560        /// The map argument as it appears at the law's call site.
561        map_arg: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
562        /// The key argument as it appears at the law's call site.
563        key_arg: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
564        /// Additional helper-fn source names to unfold on top of
565        /// `outer_fn` — only used for `GetAfter`, where the rhs's
566        /// `Option.Some(...)` typically wraps the prior value via a
567        /// pure user helper (e.g. `addOne(...)`). Source names;
568        /// backends translate to their lemma vocabulary.
569        extra_unfolds: Vec<String>,
570    },
571    /// Counter-increment specialisation of [`MapUpdatePostcondition`].
572    /// The outer fn `outer(m, k)` is the canonical "tracked counter"
573    /// shape:
574    ///
575    /// ```text
576    /// let v = Map.get m k
577    /// match v {
578    ///   Some(n) -> Map.set m k (n + 1)
579    ///   None    -> Map.set m k 1
580    /// }
581    /// ```
582    ///
583    /// The law states the algebraic content:
584    /// `Option.withDefault(Map.get(outer(m, k), k), 0) ==
585    /// Option.withDefault(Map.get(m, k), 0) + 1` — get-or-default
586    /// after the increment equals the prior get-or-default plus 1.
587    /// Tighter than [`MapUpdatePostcondition`] because both the body
588    /// template AND the rhs `+ 1` shape are pinned.
589    MapKeyTrackedIncrement {
590        /// Source name of the outer increment fn.
591        outer_fn: String,
592        /// The map argument as it appears at the law's call site.
593        map_arg: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
594        /// The key argument as it appears at the law's call site.
595        key_arg: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
596    },
597    /// Functional equivalence between an impl fn and a (declared)
598    /// spec fn — the law states `impl(args) == spec(args)` and the
599    /// two fn bodies are syntactically identical (after typecheck).
600    /// Backends close the goal by unfolding both fns; their bodies
601    /// reduce to the same term and the equality holds by reflexivity
602    /// modulo simp normalisation. Lean emits `simpa [<unfolds>]`,
603    /// Dafny would reveal both and let Z3 prove the equivalence.
604    /// Named for the algebraic content (functional equivalence),
605    /// not the backend tactic.
606    SpecEquivalence {
607        /// All user fn source names to unfold — impl + spec + any
608        /// transitively-reached helpers from law sides. Source
609        /// names; backends translate to their lemma vocabulary.
610        extra_unfolds: Vec<String>,
611    },
612    /// Broader [`SpecEquivalence`] for cases where impl and spec
613    /// bodies are NOT syntactically identical but normalize to the
614    /// same expression under arg substitution + simp arithmetic
615    /// identity folding (`a + 0 == a`, `a * 1 == a`, `a * 0 ==
616    /// 0`). Backends close via `simp` (no `simpa` — there's no
617    /// trivial-rfl goal to discharge; simp normalisation does the
618    /// closing). Same `extra_unfolds` payload as `SpecEquivalence`.
619    SpecEquivalenceSimpNormalized {
620        /// All user fn source names to unfold — impl + spec + any
621        /// transitively-reached helpers from law sides.
622        extra_unfolds: Vec<String>,
623    },
624    /// Linear-Int spec equivalence — impl and spec bodies are both
625    /// linear arithmetic expressions over Int givens (only
626    /// `Literal::Int`, given idents, `Add`, `Sub`) after arg
627    /// substitution. Bodies may differ syntactically but the
628    /// equivalence is decidable by a linear-arithmetic solver
629    /// (Presburger / `omega` / Z3 LIA). Backends emit a `change
630    /// <impl_unfolded> = <spec_unfolded>` rewrite then close via
631    /// their decision procedure; the IR carries the substituted
632    /// expressions so the backend can render them via its own
633    /// `emit_expr`.
634    LinearIntSpecEquivalence {
635        /// Impl body with formal params substituted by call-site
636        /// args. Linear-arithmetic-only after substitution.
637        unfolded_impl: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
638        /// Spec body with formal params substituted by call-site
639        /// args. Linear-arithmetic-only after substitution.
640        unfolded_spec: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
641    },
642    /// Functional equivalence between an effectful impl fn and a
643    /// spec fn. Same "claim states `impl(args) == spec(args)`"
644    /// content as [`SpecEquivalence`], but the law's source-level
645    /// shape is non-canonical (impl call usually omits oracle args
646    /// the spec call carries explicitly). The lowerer runs an
647    /// Oracle Lift over both sides — injecting oracle args from
648    /// `given oracle: Random.int = ...` into every classified
649    /// effectful call site — and matches the canonical shape on the
650    /// rewritten form. Backends emit `simp [impl, spec]`; both
651    /// definitions unfold to the same oracle call after lifting.
652    EffectfulSpecEquivalence {
653        /// Source name of the impl fn (= `vb.fn_name`).
654        impl_fn: String,
655        /// Source name of the spec fn (the other side of the law).
656        spec_fn: String,
657    },
658    /// Second-order linear recurrence spec equivalence — impl is a
659    /// tail-recursive Int linear-pair wrapper (e.g. `fib` dispatching
660    /// on `n < 0` and calling a 3-arg `fibTR(n, 0, 1)` helper) and
661    /// spec is a direct second-order recurrence (`match n { 0 -> b0;
662    /// 1 -> b1; _ -> recurrence(spec(n-1), spec(n-2)) }`). The
663    /// impl's helper implements the same affine recurrence as the
664    /// spec's `_` arm. Both Lean and Dafny render via a Nat-keyed
665    /// helper + shift lemma + helper-seed bridge; the algebraic
666    /// content (a fixed-point of the recurrence) is the same in both
667    /// targets but the syntactic proof template differs per backend.
668    LinearRecurrence2SpecEquivalence {
669        /// Source name of the impl (tail-recursive wrapper) fn.
670        impl_fn: String,
671        /// Source name of the spec (direct recurrence) fn.
672        spec_fn: String,
673        /// Source name of the worker fn called by `impl_fn`.
674        helper_fn: String,
675    },
676    /// Bounded universal: case-split over the declared `given`
677    /// domain, dispatch each case to a per-sample lemma.
678    BoundedUniversal,
679    /// Two `MatchDispatcherFold` fns over the same `List<T>` param
680    /// compute the same result via slightly different but structurally
681    /// identical match-on-list bodies. The law states
682    /// `fold_fn(xs) == spec_fn(xs)`; the proof closes by induction on
683    /// `xs` with both nil and cons cases reducing to arithmetic
684    /// identities. Demonstrated by `examples/data/list_length_fold.av`
685    /// (`lengthFwd(xs) = 1 + lengthFwd(t)` vs
686    /// `lengthSwap(xs) = lengthSwap(t) + 1` — equivalent via
687    /// commutativity, closes via `omega`).
688    ///
689    /// Stage 8c of #232 — third typed-pattern consumer in
690    /// `proof_lower`.
691    MatchDispatcherFold {
692        /// Source name of the LHS fold fn (the law's surrounding fn).
693        fold_fn: String,
694        /// Source name of the RHS spec fn — also a list-fold of the
695        /// same shape.
696        spec_fn: String,
697    },
698    /// `?`-propagating Result chain equals a manual `match`-version:
699    /// the law states `chain_qm(x) == chain_manual(x)` where the
700    /// LHS uses `?` for short-circuit Err propagation and the RHS
701    /// writes the same flow as nested `match Result.Err -> Err`
702    /// arms. Both sides unfold to the same nested match; the proof
703    /// closes by unfolding all step fns and case-splitting on each
704    /// step's Result discriminator. Demonstrated by
705    /// `examples/core/result_chain.av`. Stage 8b of #232.
706    ResultPipelineChain {
707        /// Source name of the `?`-chain fn (the wrapper). LHS of the law.
708        chain_qm_fn: String,
709        /// Source name of the manual `match`-chain fn. RHS of the law.
710        chain_manual_fn: String,
711        /// Source names of every step fn the two chains thread
712        /// through, in pipeline order. Drives the unfold list for
713        /// both backends.
714        step_fns: Vec<String>,
715    },
716    /// Monoidal-accumulator wrapper-over-recursion: a non-recursive
717    /// `wrapper_fn(xs) = inner_fn(xs, neutral)` paired with a direct-
718    /// recurrence `other_fn` such that the law states
719    /// `wrapper_fn(xs) == other_fn(xs)`. The inner fn has shape
720    /// `match xs { [] -> acc; [h, ..t] -> inner_fn(t, acc <op> h) }`
721    /// where `<op>` is monoidal (`Add` / `Mul` / `Sub` on Int) with
722    /// known neutral element. Strategy emits an aux accumulator-
723    /// decomposition lemma plus the main universal lemma; Z3 closes
724    /// both via list induction. Demonstrated by `examples/data/sum_acc.av`.
725    ///
726    /// Stage 8 of #232 — first ProofStrategy variant that consumes
727    /// a `ModulePattern` from `analysis::shape`.
728    WrapperOverRecursion {
729        /// Source name of the non-recursive wrapper (e.g. `"sum"`).
730        wrapper_fn: String,
731        /// Source name of the self-recursive inner (e.g. `"sumTR"`).
732        inner_fn: String,
733        /// Source name of the direct-recurrence fn the law compares
734        /// the wrapper against (e.g. `"sumDirect"`).
735        other_fn: String,
736        /// Binary op the inner threads through its accumulator
737        /// (`Add` / `Mul` / `Sub`). Drives the aux lemma's RHS.
738        combine_op: crate::ast::BinOp,
739    },
740    /// Ground constant-fold over fixed ADT/enum constructor
741    /// arguments. The law's call(s) pin every non-Int param of the
742    /// verified fn to a constructor literal (`CellContent.Empty`,
743    /// `Color.Black`); any scalar `given`s are quantified but irrelevant
744    /// to the chosen branch (the constructor selects a fixed arm). The
745    /// verified fn and its transitively-reached callees are
746    /// non-recursive, so the whole call tree folds to a closed term and
747    /// the goal becomes a decidable ground equality. Backends unfold the
748    /// fn + callees (the same `unfold_fns` list the LinearArithmetic
749    /// detector builds) and close with a `split`/`rfl`/`decide` cascade.
750    /// Demonstrated by `examples/games/checkers/ai.av`
751    /// (`centerBonus.emptyNeutral`, `pieceValue.antisymmetry`,
752    /// `pieceValue.kingWorthTripleMan`). Named for the algebraic content
753    /// (constant-folding over a fixed constructor), not the Lean tactic.
754    EnumConstantFold {
755        /// Ordered fn unfold list — top-level law fn first, then
756        /// transitively-reached non-recursive callees. Source names;
757        /// backends translate to their lemma vocabulary.
758        unfold_fns: Vec<String>,
759    },
760    /// Closed finite-domain enumeration over the law's givens. Every
761    /// given ranges over a closed, small domain — `Bool` or a
762    /// user-declared enum whose constructors are ALL fieldless — with
763    /// the product of domain sizes ≤ 16, so exhaustive `cases` over
764    /// the givens yields ground goals that compute out (`rfl` /
765    /// `decide`). Fuel-wrapped callees are NOT an obstacle:
766    /// constant-measure constructor args compute through fuel. The
767    /// detector deliberately has NO call-shape inspection, NO
768    /// return-type gate and NO recursion gate — closed enumeration
769    /// makes those irrelevant, which is why this is a NEW strategy and
770    /// not a relaxation of [`ProofStrategy::EnumConstantFold`], whose
771    /// literal-pinning / non-recursive / scalar-return gates are
772    /// load-bearing for its simp cascade. Motivating shapes:
773    /// `examples/data/json.av` `parseLiteral.boolRoundtrip` (closes
774    /// genuinely with `intro b; cases b <;> rfl`) and the `EscapeCode`
775    /// laws (`escapeJsonChar.encodesEscapeCode`,
776    /// `parseEscape.escapeCodeRoundtrip`). A non-closing leaf degrades
777    /// to an honest caught `sorry` — never a build error and never
778    /// `native_decide`.
779    FiniteDomainCases {
780        /// Law given names in intro order — the Lean emitter's
781        /// `cases` targets. Source names; backends translate.
782        givens: Vec<String>,
783    },
784    /// Builtin-roundtrip simp over the prelude's spec-lemma registry —
785    /// the last typed fallback before `BackendDispatch`, and the only
786    /// strategy the Lean backend renders AFTER its legacy ad-hoc chain
787    /// (so it fires precisely where the sampled-sorry fallback used to
788    /// emit a bare-`sorry` universal). A no-when law whose lhs call cone
789    /// reduces to builtin String/Int operations once the user fns
790    /// unfold: the Lean emit is `intro <givens>; first | (simp [<unfold
791    /// set>, <registry lemmas>, Int.add_sub_cancel]; done) | sorry`. The
792    /// `done` + `first | … | sorry` alternation is the honest floor — a
793    /// simp that fails OR leaves a residual goal degrades to a caught
794    /// `sorry`, NEVER a build error and NEVER `native_decide`.
795    /// Motivating shapes: `examples/data/json.av`
796    /// `finishInt.fromCanonicalInt` (closes via
797    /// `Int.fromString_fromInt`), `finishNumber.fromCanonicalIntSlice` /
798    /// `afterIntChar.terminatedIntRoundtrip` (slice-prefix lemmas
799    /// through the `toString` fuel wrapper) and
800    /// `finishString.plainSegmentRoundtrip` (`String.slice_append_prefix`
801    /// + `String.intercalate_singleton`).
802    ///
803    /// Deliberately a NEW variant and not a reuse of
804    /// [`ProofStrategy::SimpOverLemmas`]: that variant is the discovery
805    /// feedback loop's re-pin channel (`lemma_discovery::committed`
806    /// re-pins an `Induction` law when committed *discovered* lemma
807    /// texts are in scope, and the backend routes it through the
808    /// induction emit with embedded lemma bodies). This strategy carries
809    /// no lemma texts and never inducts — it names *static prelude*
810    /// lemmas that the Lean emitter ships demand-driven (see
811    /// `lean::prelude_spec_lemmas_for_builtins`, the single source of
812    /// truth for the builtin → lemma-name registry). Keeping the two
813    /// apart means neither the discovery CLI nor `committed.rs` ever
814    /// has to reason about this variant.
815    SimpOverPreludeLemmas {
816        /// Ordered fn unfold list — law subject fn first, then the
817        /// transitively-reached NON-recursive callees (sorted).
818        /// Source names; backends translate.
819        unfold_fns: Vec<String>,
820        /// Recursive (fuel-emitted) fns called DIRECTLY in the law lhs
821        /// with measure-closed args (constructor-headed over
822        /// scalar-only payloads, or literals) — the fuel value
823        /// computes to a Nat literal, so simp drives the `__fuel`
824        /// equations through. The Lean emitter expands each name to
825        /// wrapper + `<name>__fuel` + its measure-helper names.
826        /// Recursive fns reached only transitively (inside cone
827        /// bodies) are NOT listed: they stay opaque — usually dead
828        /// branches under the law's pinned literal args, and if live
829        /// the simp falls to the honest caught `sorry`.
830        fuel_fns: Vec<String>,
831        /// Builtin call names observed in the law sides + cone bodies
832        /// (sorted; includes the synthetic `String.concat` marker for
833        /// string `+`). Registry keys — the Lean emitter maps them to
834        /// prelude spec lemma names via
835        /// `prelude_spec_lemmas_for_builtins`.
836        builtins: Vec<String>,
837    },
838    /// Decimal-Int parse/serialize roundtrip over the canonical
839    /// single-scanner decimal parser shape: the law states
840    /// `parse(ser(C(n)), 0) = Ok(C(n), String.len(ser(C(n))))` for an
841    /// unconstrained `given n: Int`, where `parse` dispatches the head
842    /// char (`"-"` → sign path, `"0"` → leading-zero scan, `_` → digit
843    /// path), both paths funnel into ONE recognized fuelized
844    /// string-position scanner (`proof_recognize::detect_string_pos_scan`
845    /// — the same gate that makes the Lean backend synthesize the
846    /// scanner's `<fn>__fuel_scan` companion lemma), and the cone
847    /// bottoms out in `String.fromInt` / `Int.fromString`.
848    ///
849    /// The detector validates the ENTIRE canonical shape (arm literals,
850    /// arm order, scanner pins, finish-fn slice + `Int.fromString`
851    /// leaf), so the Lean emission can render the fixed
852    /// sign-split proof skeleton ported from the verified json hand
853    /// proof: serializer reduces by `rfl` (ADT-measure fuel),
854    /// `rcases Int.ofNat | Int.negSucc`, head-char dispatch via
855    /// `String.mk`-form `rfl`, `split` + `digitChar` contradiction
856    /// lemmas, the synthesized scan lemma, and `Int.fromString_fromInt`
857    /// at the `finish_int_fn` leaf. The whole emission is wrapped in
858    /// `first | (… ; done) | sorry` — a non-closing case degrades to a
859    /// caught honest `sorry`, never a build error, and `native_decide`
860    /// never appears. Dafny treats the pin as `BackendDispatch`
861    /// (exports byte-identical).
862    ///
863    /// Demonstrated by `examples/data/json.av`
864    /// `parseNumber.fromIntRoundtrip` — the first universal close
865    /// through the fuel-unfolding barrier on a string whose length is
866    /// symbolic.
867    IntDecimalRoundtrip {
868        /// Subject parser fn (`parseNumber`). Source names throughout.
869        parse_fn: String,
870        /// `"-"`-arm continuation (`parseNumberSign`).
871        neg_fn: String,
872        /// Wildcard-arm digit dispatcher (`startNumberDigits`).
873        pos_fn: String,
874        /// Sign path's digit dispatcher (`startSignDigit`).
875        sign_fn: String,
876        /// The recognized fuelized scanner (`scanIntTail`).
877        scanner_fn: String,
878        /// The scanner's char-class predicate (`isDigit`).
879        predicate_fn: String,
880        /// Scanner exit continuation (`finishNumber`).
881        finish_fn: String,
882        /// Int leaf — slices + `Int.fromString` (`finishInt`).
883        finish_int_fn: String,
884        /// Serializer the law's lhs feeds the parser (`toString`).
885        serializer_fn: String,
886    },
887    /// String escape/parse roundtrip over the canonical
888    /// segment-chunking string scanner: the law states
889    /// `parse(<open> + escape(s) + <terminator>, 1) =
890    /// Ok(StrCtor(s), String.len(escape(s)) + 2)` for an unconstrained
891    /// `given s: String` (or the same claim entered at the scanner
892    /// itself with `pos = segmentStart = 1, chunks = []`). The
893    /// producer is a per-char classifier fold (two-char escape table +
894    /// hex control escapes + printable passthrough); the consumer is a
895    /// fuel mutual SCC (scan / escape-dispatch / validate / unicode
896    /// chain) whose per-arm shapes the detector validates EXACTLY —
897    /// see [`StringEscapeRoundtripPin`] for every captured name and
898    /// literal, and `proof_lower::string_escape_roundtrip` for the
899    /// gates.
900    ///
901    /// The Lean emission renders the suffix-invariant proof skeleton
902    /// ported from the verified json hand proof (kernel-checked on
903    /// Lean 4.15, #print axioms = [propext, Quot.sound]): a
904    /// drop-form suffix-cursor prelude, the producer fold's
905    /// accumulator homomorphism, one step lemma per consumer fuel
906    /// arm, and a chunk invariant with the carried scanner state
907    /// (segmentStart, chunks) universally quantified, closed by
908    /// per-char classification. Every synthesized lemma carries a
909    /// `first | (…; done) | sorry` floor — a template regression
910    /// degrades to caught honest sorries (loud budget red), never a
911    /// build error, and `native_decide` never appears. Dafny treats
912    /// the pin as `BackendDispatch` (exports byte-identical).
913    ///
914    /// Demonstrated by `examples/data/json.av`
915    /// `escapeJsonString.parseStringRoundtrip` and
916    /// `parseStringChunk.escapedStringRoundtrip` — the parser
917    /// workhorse pair that closes json's pinned Lean budget to 0.
918    StringEscapeRoundtrip(Box<StringEscapeRoundtripPin>),
919    /// Unconditional ring identity over Int-component records — the
920    /// algebra-law family of an exact-rationals library (a record
921    /// with Int numerator/denominator fields, non-normalizing
922    /// arithmetic, equality by cross-multiplication): add/mul
923    /// commutativity and associativity, distributivity, neg/sub
924    /// normal forms, identity elements. The law has no `when`, every
925    /// given is `Int` or a record whose fields are ALL `Int` (at
926    /// least one such record given), and the claim's whole unfold
927    /// cone is non-recursive pure arithmetic — record constructions
928    /// / field projections, Int literals, `+`, `-`, `*`, unary
929    /// negation — with the equality bottoming out in Int `==`
930    /// (a Bool comparator fn applied at the law root, compared to
931    /// `true`) or direct value equality of two such arithmetic
932    /// expressions. Both sides are then polynomial identities:
933    /// distributing products over sums and AC-normalizing monomials
934    /// and sums makes the two sides' monomial multisets identical,
935    /// no coefficient collection needed.
936    ///
937    /// The Lean emit is `intro <givens>; first | (simp [<unfold
938    /// cone>, <fixed core AC-ring lemma package>]; done) | sorry` —
939    /// the honest caught-`sorry` floor; never `native_decide`, never
940    /// a build error. The package is SCOPED TO THIS STRATEGY's
941    /// emission: its permutational rewrites (`Int.mul_comm`,
942    /// `Int.add_comm`, …) loop or destroy the normal forms other
943    /// strategies' simp sets rely on, so they are never added to the
944    /// shared prelude registry. Dafny needs no special handling —
945    /// Z3 decides these nonlinear identities push-button — and
946    /// treats the pin like `BackendDispatch` (exports stay
947    /// byte-identical). Demonstrated by `examples/data/rational.av`.
948    RingIdentity {
949        /// Ordered fn unfold list — law subject fn first, then the
950        /// transitively-reached callees (sorted). Source names;
951        /// backends translate to their lemma vocabulary.
952        unfold_fns: Vec<String>,
953    },
954    /// Floor-division window family — laws over a power-of-two fn
955    /// (`match n <= 0 { true -> 1; false -> 2 * pow(n - 1) }`), a
956    /// floor-halving binary-exponent fn (the
957    /// [`RecursionContract::WellFoundedToNat`] class with divisor 2),
958    /// and the scaled-significand / bit-width window predicates built
959    /// from them. Each [`FloorWindowFigure`] is a fully-validated
960    /// shape with a fixed proof template on both backends (Lean: the
961    /// core `Int.le_ediv_iff_mul_le` / `Int.ediv_lt_iff_lt_mul`
962    /// floor bridges + power algebra by functional induction; Dafny:
963    /// a proved division-window prelude + branch-split helper
964    /// lemmas). The recognizers are deliberately narrow — exactly the
965    /// hand-validated figures; everything else declines and keeps
966    /// the prior emission.
967    FloorDivWindow { figure: FloorWindowFigure },
968    /// No automated strategy — emit with `sorry` (Lean) / `assume
969    /// {:axiom}` (Dafny). User fills in manually.
970    Sorry,
971    /// Lowerer has not pinned a strategy for this law; the backend's
972    /// `or_else` chain decides. Today reached by linear-recurrence-
973    /// spec equivalence (Lean-specific, ~50-line support theorems
974    /// stay in the backend) and the sampled / guarded-domain
975    /// fallback. The backend treats `BackendDispatch` as "fall
976    /// through to ad-hoc strategy chain"; pinned variants above
977    /// short-circuit to a known emit.
978    BackendDispatch,
979}
980
981/// The recognized figures of [`ProofStrategy::FloorDivWindow`]. All
982/// fn names are source names; backends translate. Every figure's
983/// quantifier names come from the law's givens (captured implicitly —
984/// backends render them through the law's own given list).
985#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
986pub enum FloorWindowFigure {
987    /// `pow(n) >= 1 => true` with no premise — positivity of the
988    /// power-of-two fn, by functional induction.
989    PowPositive { pow_fn: String },
990    /// `when m >= 0; n >= 0 -> pow(m + n) == pow(m) * pow(n)` — the
991    /// power homomorphism, by functional induction on the first
992    /// exponent.
993    PowSumSplit { pow_fn: String },
994    /// `when b >= 1; a >= b; n >= 1 -> window(a, b, n) == true`
995    /// where `window` checks `pow(n-1) <= sig(a,b,n) < pow(n)`,
996    /// `sig` scales by `pow(n-1-e)` and floor-divides, and `e` is
997    /// the floor-halving binary exponent of a/b.
998    SigWindow {
999        pow_fn: String,
1000        halve_fn: String,
1001        exp_fn: String,
1002        sig_fn: String,
1003        window_fn: String,
1004    },
1005    /// `when fits(j, m); fits(k, n) -> claim(j, k, m, n) == true`
1006    /// where `fits` is the `pow(m-1) <= j < pow(m)` window predicate
1007    /// and `claim` states the product window
1008    /// `pow(m+n-2) <= j*k < pow(m+n)`.
1009    ProductWindow {
1010        pow_fn: String,
1011        fits_fn: String,
1012        claim_fn: String,
1013    },
1014}
1015
1016/// Parameter pack for [`ProofStrategy::StringEscapeRoundtrip`] —
1017/// every fn name and literal the Lean renderer's suffix-invariant
1018/// proof skeleton quotes. All fn names are source names (backends
1019/// translate); all chars/codes are the SOURCE literals the detector
1020/// read off the validated arm patterns, so the renderer can rebuild
1021/// them as Lean literals without re-walking the AST.
1022#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
1023pub struct StringEscapeRoundtripPin {
1024    /// The scanner SCC member the law enters (`parseStringChunk`).
1025    /// Body: charAt dispatch over { terminator → finish, escape-char
1026    /// → escape dispatch, default → validate }.
1027    pub scan_fn: String,
1028    /// Escape dispatcher (`parseEscape`): slices the open segment,
1029    /// then maps escape letters to decoded chars / the unicode hop.
1030    pub escape_fn: String,
1031    /// Default-arm validator (`validateChar`): control chars error,
1032    /// printable chars extend the open segment.
1033    pub validate_fn: String,
1034    /// Terminator continuation (`finishString`): slice + join + Ok.
1035    pub finish_fn: String,
1036    /// `\uXXXX` reader head (`parseUnicode`): readHex4 + codepoint.
1037    pub unicode_fn: String,
1038    /// Codepoint surrogate filter (`parseUnicodeCodePoint`).
1039    pub codepoint_fn: String,
1040    /// Decoded-codepoint continuation (`applyCodePoint`):
1041    /// `Char.fromCode` + chunk flush back into the scanner.
1042    pub apply_fn: String,
1043    /// Four-hex-digit reader (`readHex4`), separately fueled on
1044    /// `count` climbing to the literal bound 4.
1045    pub read_hex_fn: String,
1046    /// User hex-digit valuation (`hexVal : String -> Option<Int>`).
1047    pub hex_val_fn: String,
1048    /// High-surrogate guard (`isHighSurrogate`): `cp >= MIN && …`.
1049    pub high_surrogate_fn: String,
1050    /// Low-surrogate guard (`isLowSurrogate`).
1051    pub low_surrogate_fn: String,
1052    /// Producer wrapper (`escapeJsonString`): `fold(String.chars(s), "")`.
1053    pub producer_fn: String,
1054    /// Producer accumulator fold (`escapeJsonChars`).
1055    pub fold_fn: String,
1056    /// Per-char classifier (`escapeJsonChar`): two-char escape table
1057    /// + default to the control classifier.
1058    pub classifier_fn: String,
1059    /// Control classifier (`escapeControlChar`): equality ladder +
1060    /// `code < threshold → control escape` + printable passthrough.
1061    pub control_fn: String,
1062    /// Hex control escape (`controlCodeEscape`): `Byte.toHex` +
1063    /// 4-char prefix.
1064    pub control_escape_fn: String,
1065    /// Success ctor of the law's rhs, source spelling
1066    /// (`"ParseResult.Ok"`).
1067    pub ok_ctor: String,
1068    /// String-payload ctor inside the success ctor
1069    /// (`"Json.JsonString"`).
1070    pub str_ctor: String,
1071    /// Scan terminator char (`'"'` — the finish arm's literal).
1072    pub terminator: char,
1073    /// Escape introducer char (`'\\'` — the escape arm's literal,
1074    /// also the first char of every two-char escape output).
1075    pub escape_char: char,
1076    /// Hex-escape letter (`'u'` — second char of the control-escape
1077    /// prefix, the consumer's unicode arm literal).
1078    pub unicode_letter: char,
1079    /// Two-char escape table, producer-derived and consumer-aligned.
1080    pub pairs: Vec<EscapePairSpec>,
1081    /// Control threshold (`32`): producer hex-escapes below it, the
1082    /// consumer validator rejects below it. Gated `<= 256`.
1083    pub control_threshold: i64,
1084    /// `cp >= MIN` bound of the high-surrogate guard (`55296`).
1085    pub high_surrogate_min: i64,
1086    /// `cp >= MIN` bound of the low-surrogate guard (`56320`).
1087    /// The Lean renderer probes the scanner SCC's emitted
1088    /// `averStringPosFuel` rank itself (it must match the emission
1089    /// byte-for-byte), so the rank is deliberately NOT pinned here.
1090    pub low_surrogate_min: i64,
1091}
1092
1093/// One two-char escape: the producer emits `[escape_char, letter]`
1094/// for `decoded`; the consumer's escape dispatcher maps `letter`
1095/// back to `decoded`.
1096#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
1097pub struct EscapePairSpec {
1098    /// The unescaped source char (`'\n'`).
1099    pub decoded: char,
1100    /// The escape letter following the escape introducer (`'n'`).
1101    pub letter: char,
1102    /// `true` when the pair comes from the control classifier's
1103    /// equality ladder (`code == 8 → "\\b"`), `false` for a
1104    /// classifier literal arm (`"\n" → "\\n"`). Drives which
1105    /// disequality form the chunk-invariant ladder cases on
1106    /// (`c.toNat = K` vs `c = '<lit>'`).
1107    pub from_control_ladder: bool,
1108}
1109
1110/// Discriminator for [`ProofStrategy::MapUpdatePostcondition`].
1111#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
1112pub enum MapUpdatePostconditionKind {
1113    /// Law shape: `Map.has(outer(m, k), k) == true`.
1114    HasAfter,
1115    /// Law shape: `Map.get(outer(m, k), k) == Option.Some(...)`.
1116    GetAfter,
1117}
1118
1119/// A bool predicate with explicit free-variable context. Stays in
1120/// `Spanned<Expr>` form so backends can route through their
1121/// existing `emit_expr` paths; the context is what gives backends
1122/// the information they need to project (e.g. `.val`) without
1123/// re-walking the AST.
1124#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
1125pub struct Predicate {
1126    /// Variables the predicate may reference, in declaration order.
1127    /// Each entry tells the backend what type the var has in the
1128    /// target language — same logic as `Quantifier.binder_type`.
1129    pub free_vars: Vec<(String, QuantifierType)>,
1130    /// The expression. Already in the target variable space (e.g.
1131    /// caller-derived predicates have had caller-arg names
1132    /// substituted to callee-param names).
1133    pub expr: Spanned<crate::ir::hir::ResolvedExpr>,
1134}