Expand description

§Introduction

A struct for recording execution status of async tasks with async methods.

Functions:

  • Able to host Futures and query whether they are not found, successful, failed, or running.
  • Able to host Futures to revoke the succeeded Futures and make them not found.

Dependency:

  • Depend on tokio with feature rt, so cannot use other async runtimes.
  • Depend on scc for async HashSet.

Use this crate if:

  • Easy to generate an unique task_id (not necessarily String) for a future (task).
  • Don’t want tasks with the same task_id to succeed more than once.
  • Want to record and query all succeeded tasks and failed tasks.
  • Want to handle every task in the same state (not just focus on one state).
  • Need linearizable query.
  • Want to revoke a task, and don’t want the revoking to succeed more than once.

Example.

A recorder can only use one task_id type. The type of task_id should be:

  • Eq + Hash + Clone + Send + Sync + 'static
  • Cheap to clone (sometimes can use Arc).

§Usage

Launch a task with a unique task_id and a Future by launch.

Query the state of the task with its task_id by query_task_state or query_task_state_quick.

Revoke a task with its task_id and a Future for revoking by revoke_task_block.

§Skills

Remember that you can add anything in the Future to achieve the functionality you want. For example:

  • Handle your Result in Future, and then return empty result Result<(),()>.
  • Send a message to a one shot channel at the end of the Future to notify upper level that “this task done”. Don’t forget to consider using tokio::spawn when the channel may not complete sending immediately.
  • Set other callback functions.

It’s still efficient to store metadata of tasks at external scc::HashMap (task_id -> metadata).

It is recommended to directly look at the source code (about 150 line) if there is any confusion.

§When Shouldn’t Use This Crate

The consumption of all operations in this crate and cloning times is about two to three times that of the implementation using scc::Hashmap.

This crate use three HashSet to make it easy to operate all tasks in the same state, And two more HashSet for linearizability of query and supporting revoking operation.

Note that scc’s containers have less contention in single access when it grows larger.

Therefore, if you don’t need operating every task in the same state, then just use scc::HashMap (task_id -> task_status) to build a simpler implementation, which might have less contention and cloning, but more expansive to iterate. And the scc::HashMap::update_async could be a powerful tool for atomic operations.

You should also avoid using this crate if you just want to handle every task in only one state. For example, if you just want to manage the failed tasks, then you should use scc::HashMap to record tasks’ states, and insert the failed tasks into an external Arc<scc::HashSet> in Future.

§Theory & Design

§Abstract Model

Here is the three-level structure for thinking about tasks’ status:

  • Level 0: real_not_found, real_failed, real_working, real_success : Exact status of the tasks in the CPU (seen by God).
  • Level 1: failed_tasks, working_tasks, success_tasks : Containers to store task_ids (a task_id can be stored in 0 to 2 containers simultaneously).
  • Level 2: NotFound, Failed, Working, Success : States of the task that could be obtained by query_task_state.

§State Transition Diagram

  • NotFound ----> Working (first launch)
  • Working ----> Failed (task failed)
  • Failed ----> Working (first launch after failed)
  • Working ----> Success (task success)
  • Success ----> NotFound (revoke)

If you equivalent NotFound to Failed, and ignore revoke, then:

Failed <---> Working ----> Success

§Nature

§About Task

  1. A task is launched by passing a Future<Output=Result<R, E>> with unique task_id.
  2. A task is real_success when return Ok(R), and real_failed when return Err(E).
  3. Different future with the same task_id is considered the same task.
  4. The same task can only real_success once, e.g. a purchase process would never succeed more then once by launching with unique process id as task_id.
  5. A succeeded task can only be revoked successfully once.

§About Task State

  1. If a task’s state is Success, it must be real_success, i.e. $\text{Success}(id) \rightarrow \text{real_success}(id)$.
  2. If a task’s state is Failed, it may be in any status, but mostly real_failed.
  3. If a task’s state is Working, it may be in any status, but mostly real_working.
  4. If a task’s state is NotFound, it may be in any status, but mostly real_not_found.

§About Task State Transition

  1. Any task’s state can be queried at any time.
  2. The initial state of the task is NotFound.
  3. Task’s state won’t change immediately after launch called. But if you query after launch().await, you will get changed result.
  4. Always, when a task whose state is Failed or NotFound is launched, it will be Working at some future moment.
  5. Always, when a task is Working, it would eventually be Fail or Success.
  6. Always, when a task is Success, it would keep Success until the revoking succeed, and then become NotFound.

§Other

Further propositions and proofs at AsyncTasksRecorder.

Relationship between states and containers at query_task_state.

Use query_task_state_quick for less contention.

Re-exports§

Structs§

  • Arc was used internally, so after clone, the same TaskManager was used, which means you can share AsyncTasksRecorder by clone.
  • Thread-safe.

Enums§