1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84

use schemars::JsonSchema;

use std::fmt;

use abstract_cw1::CanExecuteResponse;
use cosmwasm_schema::{cw_serde, QueryResponses};
use cosmwasm_std::{CosmosMsg, Empty};
#[cw_serde]
pub struct InstantiateMsg {
    pub admins: Vec<String>,
    pub mutable: bool,
}

#[cw_serde]
#[derive(cw_orch::ExecuteFns)]
pub enum ExecuteMsg<T = Empty>
where
    T: Clone + fmt::Debug + PartialEq + JsonSchema,
{
    /// Execute requests the contract to re-dispatch all these messages with the
    /// contract's address as sender. Every implementation has it's own logic to
    /// determine in
    Execute { msgs: Vec<CosmosMsg<T>> },
    /// Freeze will make a mutable contract immutable, must be called by an admin
    Freeze {},
    /// UpdateAdmins will change the admin set of the contract, must be called by an existing admin,
    /// and only works if the contract is mutable
    UpdateAdmins { admins: Vec<String> },
}

#[cw_serde]
#[derive(QueryResponses, cw_orch::QueryFns)]
pub enum QueryMsg<T = Empty>
where
    T: Clone + fmt::Debug + PartialEq + JsonSchema,
{
    /// Shows all admins and whether or not it is mutable
    #[returns(AdminListResponse)]
    AdminList {},
    /// Checks permissions of the caller on this proxy.
    /// If CanExecute returns true then a call to `Execute` with the same message,
    /// before any further state changes, should also succeed.
    #[returns(CanExecuteResponse)]
    CanExecute { sender: String, msg: CosmosMsg<T> },
}

#[cw_serde]
pub struct AdminListResponse {
    pub admins: Vec<String>,
    pub mutable: bool,
}

#[cfg(any(test, feature = "test-utils"))]
impl AdminListResponse {
    /// Utility function for converting message to its canonical form, so two messages with
    /// different representation but same semantic meaning can be easily compared.
    ///
    /// It could be encapsulated in custom `PartialEq` implementation, but `PartialEq` is expected
    /// to be quickly, so it seems to be reasonable to keep it as representation-equality, and
    /// canonicalize message only when it is needed
    ///
    /// Example:
    ///
    /// ```
    /// # use abstract_cw1_whitelist::msg::AdminListResponse;
    ///
    /// let resp1 = AdminListResponse {
    ///   admins: vec!["admin1".to_owned(), "admin2".to_owned()],
    ///   mutable: true,
    /// };
    ///
    /// let resp2 = AdminListResponse {
    ///   admins: vec!["admin2".to_owned(), "admin1".to_owned(), "admin2".to_owned()],
    ///   mutable: true,
    /// };
    ///
    /// assert_eq!(resp1.canonical(), resp2.canonical());
    /// ```
    pub fn canonical(mut self) -> Self {
        self.admins.sort();
        self.admins.dedup();
        self
    }
}