Skip to main content

ripvec_core/
hybrid.rs

1//! Hybrid semantic + keyword search with Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF).
2//!
3//! [`HybridIndex`] wraps a [`SearchIndex`] (dense vector search) and a
4//! [`Bm25Index`] (BM25 keyword search) and fuses their ranked results via
5//! Reciprocal Rank Fusion so that chunks appearing high in either list
6//! bubble to the top of the combined ranking.
7
8use std::collections::HashMap;
9use std::fmt;
10use std::str::FromStr;
11
12use crate::bm25::Bm25Index;
13use crate::chunk::CodeChunk;
14use crate::index::SearchIndex;
15
16/// Controls which retrieval strategy is used during search.
17#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Default, PartialEq, Eq)]
18pub enum SearchMode {
19    /// Fuse semantic (vector) and keyword (BM25) results via RRF.
20    #[default]
21    Hybrid,
22    /// Dense vector cosine-similarity ranking only.
23    Semantic,
24    /// BM25 keyword ranking only.
25    Keyword,
26}
27
28impl fmt::Display for SearchMode {
29    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
30        match self {
31            Self::Hybrid => f.write_str("hybrid"),
32            Self::Semantic => f.write_str("semantic"),
33            Self::Keyword => f.write_str("keyword"),
34        }
35    }
36}
37
38/// Error returned when a `SearchMode` string cannot be parsed.
39#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
40pub struct ParseSearchModeError(String);
41
42impl fmt::Display for ParseSearchModeError {
43    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
44        write!(
45            f,
46            "unknown search mode {:?}; expected hybrid, semantic, or keyword",
47            self.0
48        )
49    }
50}
51
52impl std::error::Error for ParseSearchModeError {}
53
54impl FromStr for SearchMode {
55    type Err = ParseSearchModeError;
56
57    fn from_str(s: &str) -> Result<Self, Self::Err> {
58        match s {
59            "hybrid" => Ok(Self::Hybrid),
60            "semantic" => Ok(Self::Semantic),
61            "keyword" => Ok(Self::Keyword),
62            other => Err(ParseSearchModeError(other.to_string())),
63        }
64    }
65}
66
67/// Combined semantic + keyword search index with RRF fusion.
68///
69/// Build once from chunks and pre-computed embeddings; query repeatedly
70/// via [`search`](Self::search).
71pub struct HybridIndex {
72    /// Semantic (dense vector) search index.
73    pub semantic: SearchIndex,
74    /// BM25 keyword search index.
75    bm25: Bm25Index,
76}
77
78impl HybridIndex {
79    /// Build a `HybridIndex` from raw chunks and their pre-computed embeddings.
80    ///
81    /// Constructs both the [`SearchIndex`] and [`Bm25Index`] in one call.
82    /// `cascade_dim` is forwarded to [`SearchIndex::new`] for optional MRL
83    /// cascade pre-filtering.
84    ///
85    /// # Errors
86    ///
87    /// Returns an error if the BM25 index cannot be built (e.g., tantivy
88    /// schema or writer failure).
89    pub fn new(
90        chunks: Vec<CodeChunk>,
91        embeddings: &[Vec<f32>],
92        cascade_dim: Option<usize>,
93    ) -> crate::Result<Self> {
94        let bm25 = Bm25Index::build(&chunks)?;
95        let semantic = SearchIndex::new(chunks, embeddings, cascade_dim);
96        Ok(Self { semantic, bm25 })
97    }
98
99    /// Assemble a `HybridIndex` from pre-built components.
100    ///
101    /// Useful when the caller has already constructed the sub-indices
102    /// separately (e.g., loaded from a cache).
103    #[must_use]
104    pub fn from_parts(semantic: SearchIndex, bm25: Bm25Index) -> Self {
105        Self { semantic, bm25 }
106    }
107
108    /// Search the index and return `(chunk_index, score)` pairs.
109    ///
110    /// Dispatches based on `mode`:
111    /// - [`SearchMode::Semantic`] — pure dense vector search via
112    ///   [`SearchIndex::rank`].
113    /// - [`SearchMode::Keyword`] — pure BM25 keyword search, truncated to
114    ///   `top_k`.
115    /// - [`SearchMode::Hybrid`] — retrieves both ranked lists, fuses them
116    ///   with [`rrf_fuse`], then truncates to `top_k`.
117    ///
118    /// Scores are min-max normalized to `[0, 1]` regardless of mode, so
119    /// a threshold of 0.5 always means "above midpoint of the score range"
120    /// whether the underlying scores are cosine similarity, BM25, or RRF.
121    #[must_use]
122    pub fn search(
123        &self,
124        query_embedding: &[f32],
125        query_text: &str,
126        top_k: usize,
127        threshold: f32,
128        mode: SearchMode,
129    ) -> Vec<(usize, f32)> {
130        let mut raw = match mode {
131            SearchMode::Semantic => {
132                // Fetch more than top_k so normalization has a meaningful range.
133                self.semantic
134                    .rank_turboquant(query_embedding, top_k.max(100), 0.0)
135            }
136            SearchMode::Keyword => self.bm25.search(query_text, top_k.max(100)),
137            SearchMode::Hybrid => {
138                let sem = self
139                    .semantic
140                    .rank_turboquant(query_embedding, top_k.max(100), 0.0);
141                let kw = self.bm25.search(query_text, top_k.max(100));
142                rrf_fuse(&sem, &kw, 60.0)
143            }
144        };
145
146        // Min-max normalize scores to [0, 1] so threshold is model-agnostic.
147        if let (Some(max), Some(min)) = (raw.first().map(|(_, s)| *s), raw.last().map(|(_, s)| *s))
148        {
149            let range = max - min;
150            if range > f32::EPSILON {
151                for (_, score) in &mut raw {
152                    *score = (*score - min) / range;
153                }
154            } else {
155                // All scores identical — normalize to 1.0
156                for (_, score) in &mut raw {
157                    *score = 1.0;
158                }
159            }
160        }
161
162        // Apply threshold on normalized scores, then truncate
163        raw.retain(|(_, score)| *score >= threshold);
164        raw.truncate(top_k);
165        raw
166    }
167
168    /// All chunks in the index.
169    #[must_use]
170    pub fn chunks(&self) -> &[CodeChunk] {
171        &self.semantic.chunks
172    }
173}
174
175impl crate::searchable::SearchableIndex for HybridIndex {
176    fn chunks(&self) -> &[CodeChunk] {
177        HybridIndex::chunks(self)
178    }
179
180    fn search(&self, query_text: &str, top_k: usize, mode: SearchMode) -> Vec<(usize, f32)> {
181        // Trait-shape search: no caller-supplied query embedding.
182        // BM25 handles text directly. Semantic and hybrid modes would
183        // require an embedded query vector — without one they would
184        // search against a zero vector, which matches nothing
185        // useful — so we route all three modes through keyword. The
186        // caller wanting semantic results should use
187        // `search_from_chunk` (the canonical goto-definition pattern)
188        // which supplies the source chunk's embedding.
189        let _ = mode;
190        HybridIndex::search(self, &[], query_text, top_k, 0.0, SearchMode::Keyword)
191    }
192
193    fn search_from_chunk(
194        &self,
195        chunk_idx: usize,
196        query_text: &str,
197        top_k: usize,
198        mode: SearchMode,
199    ) -> Vec<(usize, f32)> {
200        let embedding = self.semantic.embedding(chunk_idx).unwrap_or_default();
201        let effective_mode = if embedding.is_empty() {
202            SearchMode::Keyword
203        } else {
204            mode
205        };
206        HybridIndex::search(self, &embedding, query_text, top_k, 0.0, effective_mode)
207    }
208}
209
210/// Reciprocal Rank Fusion of two ranked lists.
211///
212/// Each entry in `semantic` and `bm25` is `(chunk_index, _score)`.
213/// The fused score for a chunk is the sum of `1 / (k + rank + 1)` across
214/// every list the chunk appears in, where `rank` is 0-based.
215///
216/// Returns all chunks that appear in either list, sorted descending by
217/// fused RRF score.
218///
219/// `k` should typically be 60.0 — a conventional constant that smooths the
220/// ranking boost for the very top results.
221#[must_use]
222pub fn rrf_fuse(semantic: &[(usize, f32)], bm25: &[(usize, f32)], k: f32) -> Vec<(usize, f32)> {
223    let mut scores: HashMap<usize, f32> = HashMap::new();
224
225    for (rank, &(idx, _)) in semantic.iter().enumerate() {
226        *scores.entry(idx).or_insert(0.0) += 1.0 / (k + rank as f32 + 1.0);
227    }
228    for (rank, &(idx, _)) in bm25.iter().enumerate() {
229        *scores.entry(idx).or_insert(0.0) += 1.0 / (k + rank as f32 + 1.0);
230    }
231
232    let mut results: Vec<(usize, f32)> = scores.into_iter().collect();
233    results.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| {
234        b.1.total_cmp(&a.1).then_with(|| a.0.cmp(&b.0)) // stable tie-break by chunk index
235    });
236    results
237}
238
239/// Sigmoid steepness for the PageRank percentile boost. Lower values
240/// produce a sharper transition between "below median" (low boost) and
241/// "above median" (full boost).
242const PAGERANK_SIGMOID_STEEPNESS: f32 = 0.15;
243
244/// Sigmoid-shaped multiplicative boost factor for a single PageRank
245/// **percentile** in the corpus (not the raw rank value).
246///
247/// Returns the multiplier (so the final score is `dense_score * factor`).
248///
249/// ```text
250/// factor = 1 + alpha * sigmoid((percentile - 0.5) / s)
251/// sigmoid(z) = 1 / (1 + exp(-z))
252/// ```
253///
254/// where `s = PAGERANK_SIGMOID_STEEPNESS`.
255///
256/// ## Why this shape, with examples
257///
258/// The first attempt used a logarithmic saturation curve on raw rank
259/// values. That failed because raw ranks in a top-K result set
260/// concentrate in a tiny band (max ≈ 0.028 in Tokio), producing
261/// uniformly tiny boosts. The next attempt added a "presence floor"
262/// for `rank > 0`, which failed because tests also have tiny-but-
263/// positive PR from PageRank's damping term — both impl and test
264/// cleared the floor equally.
265///
266/// Switching the input to **percentile in the corpus** fixes both
267/// pathologies. A test with no inbound edges sits in the bottom decile
268/// of the PR distribution (percentile ≈ 0.05); a typical
269/// implementation file sits above the median. The sigmoid then makes
270/// the transition between "below median" (no boost) and "above median"
271/// (near-full boost) sharp:
272///
273/// | percentile | sigmoid | boost (α=0.5) |
274/// |------------|---------|---------------|
275/// | 0.05 (low test) | 0.04 | 1.02× |
276/// | 0.30           | 0.21 | 1.10× |
277/// | 0.50 (median)  | 0.50 | 1.25× |
278/// | 0.70           | 0.79 | 1.40× |
279/// | 0.95 (top impl)| 0.95 | 1.47× |
280///
281/// Ceiling at `1 + α` — with `α = 0.5` that's 1.5×, bounded enough to
282/// keep PageRank a tiebreaker rather than a dominator: an irrelevant
283/// top-PR file with dense score 0.6 gets `0.6 × 1.5 = 0.9` and still
284/// loses to a relevant low-PR file scoring above 0.9.
285///
286/// This matches the two design constraints:
287/// 1. A test (low percentile) should not be lifted above an impl
288///    (high percentile) on similar dense scores. Sigmoid centered at
289///    0.5 makes "below median" almost-no-boost.
290/// 2. A heavily-imported file shouldn't dominate. The sigmoid plateau
291///    above `percentile > 0.85` means a singularly-popular file gets
292///    barely more boost than a moderately-popular one.
293#[must_use]
294pub fn pagerank_boost_factor(percentile: f32, alpha: f32) -> f32 {
295    if percentile <= 0.0 || alpha <= 0.0 {
296        return 1.0;
297    }
298    let z = (percentile.clamp(0.0, 1.0) - 0.5) / PAGERANK_SIGMOID_STEEPNESS;
299    let sigmoid = 1.0 / (1.0 + (-z).exp());
300    1.0 + alpha * sigmoid
301}
302
303/// Apply a multiplicative PageRank boost to search results.
304///
305/// For each result, looks up the chunk's PageRank percentile and applies
306/// the sigmoid boost from [`pagerank_boost_factor`].
307///
308/// Results are re-sorted after boosting.
309///
310/// `pagerank_by_file` maps relative file paths to their **PageRank
311/// percentile** in the corpus distribution — not the raw rank value.
312/// Build it via [`pagerank_lookup`], which switched to percentile in
313/// service of the sigmoid curve.
314///
315/// `alpha` controls the maximum boost (ceiling = `1 + alpha`). The
316/// `alpha` field from [`RepoGraph`] is recommended (auto-tuned from
317/// graph density).
318pub fn boost_with_pagerank<S: std::hash::BuildHasher>(
319    results: &mut [(usize, f32)],
320    chunks: &[CodeChunk],
321    pagerank_by_file: &HashMap<String, f32, S>,
322    alpha: f32,
323) {
324    // Operates on `&mut [_]` (not `&mut Vec<_>`) so we can't delegate
325    // to `crate::ranking::PageRankBoost::apply` directly (the trait
326    // method takes `&mut Vec` to allow truncation layers). Replicate
327    // the boost loop inline; both paths share `lookup_rank` +
328    // `pagerank_boost_factor` so the curve stays consistent.
329    for (idx, score) in results.iter_mut() {
330        if let Some(chunk) = chunks.get(*idx) {
331            let rank = lookup_rank(pagerank_by_file, &chunk.file_path, &chunk.name);
332            *score *= pagerank_boost_factor(rank, alpha);
333        }
334    }
335    results.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| b.1.total_cmp(&a.1).then_with(|| a.0.cmp(&b.0)));
336}
337
338/// `boost_with_pagerank` variant that operates on `SearchResult` directly,
339/// for callers that don't have the raw `(usize, f32)` pair at hand.
340///
341/// Same boost math as [`boost_with_pagerank`]; re-sorts in place.
342pub fn boost_with_pagerank_results<S: std::hash::BuildHasher>(
343    results: &mut [crate::embed::SearchResult],
344    pagerank_by_file: &HashMap<String, f32, S>,
345    alpha: f32,
346) {
347    // SearchResult shape; inline math like `boost_with_pagerank`.
348    for r in results.iter_mut() {
349        let rank = lookup_rank(pagerank_by_file, &r.chunk.file_path, &r.chunk.name);
350        r.similarity *= pagerank_boost_factor(rank, alpha);
351    }
352    results.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| b.similarity.total_cmp(&a.similarity));
353}
354
355/// Resolve a chunk's PageRank score from a path that may be rooted
356/// differently than the graph keys.
357///
358/// Background: `RepoGraph` stores `FileNode.path` as `path.strip_prefix(root)`
359/// where `root` is the **canonicalized** corpus root. Chunk
360/// `file_path` is `path.display()` where `path` came from the walker —
361/// which uses the caller-supplied root **as-is** (not canonicalized).
362/// When the caller passes `tests/corpus/code/tokio`, chunk paths look
363/// like `tests/corpus/code/tokio/tokio/src/.../foo.rs` while graph
364/// keys look like `tokio/src/.../foo.rs`. Direct lookup never hits.
365///
366/// This function tries: definition-level exact (`"file::name"`),
367/// file-level exact, then walks the chunk path one segment at a time
368/// from the left and retries each suffix. First match wins.
369///
370/// (The proper fix is to normalize chunk paths at chunk-creation time
371/// to be relative to the canonicalized corpus root; that's a larger
372/// refactor planned alongside the `RankingLayer` work. Suffix matching
373/// is the surgical patch that makes PageRank actually function.)
374/// Re-exported under a longer name for use from the
375/// [`crate::ranking`] module. Kept as a `pub(crate)` symbol so it
376/// doesn't leak into the public surface; the canonical access point
377/// is [`crate::ranking::PageRankBoost`].
378pub(crate) fn lookup_rank_for_chunk<S: std::hash::BuildHasher>(
379    pr: &HashMap<String, f32, S>,
380    file_path: &str,
381    name: &str,
382) -> f32 {
383    lookup_rank(pr, file_path, name)
384}
385
386fn lookup_rank<S: std::hash::BuildHasher>(
387    pr: &HashMap<String, f32, S>,
388    file_path: &str,
389    name: &str,
390) -> f32 {
391    let def_key = format!("{file_path}::{name}");
392    if let Some(&r) = pr.get(&def_key) {
393        return r;
394    }
395    if let Some(&r) = pr.get(file_path) {
396        return r;
397    }
398    // Slide a left-edge cursor through the path. For
399    // `a/b/c/d/foo.rs` try `b/c/d/foo.rs`, then `c/d/foo.rs`, etc.
400    // Path components are typically <= 8 levels, so this is cheap.
401    let mut rest = file_path;
402    while let Some(idx) = rest.find('/') {
403        rest = &rest[idx + 1..];
404        if rest.is_empty() {
405            break;
406        }
407        let def_key = format!("{rest}::{name}");
408        if let Some(&r) = pr.get(&def_key) {
409            return r;
410        }
411        if let Some(&r) = pr.get(rest) {
412            return r;
413        }
414    }
415    0.0
416}
417
418/// Build a normalized PageRank lookup table from a [`RepoGraph`].
419///
420/// Returns a map from `"file_path::def_name"` to definition-level PageRank
421/// normalized to `[0, 1]`. Also inserts file-level entries (`"file_path"`)
422/// as aggregated fallback for chunks that don't match a specific definition.
423#[must_use]
424pub fn pagerank_lookup(graph: &crate::repo_map::RepoGraph) -> HashMap<String, f32> {
425    // Switched from `rank / max_rank` (proportional) to percentile in
426    // the corpus distribution. Rationale: a top-K result set typically
427    // contains files whose raw ranks are all in a tiny band near zero
428    // (Tokio: max in top-10 was 0.028 out of 1.0). Proportional
429    // normalization gave uniformly tiny boosts. Percentile separates
430    // "bottom decile (tests, leaves)" from "top half (impls, hubs)"
431    // crisply, and pairs with the sigmoid in `pagerank_boost_factor`
432    // to put the rank-transition where the action is.
433    //
434    // Definition-level and file-level percentiles use independent
435    // distributions: `def_ranks` and `base_ranks`. A file that has no
436    // defs still gets a file-level percentile from `base_ranks`.
437    let def_pct = make_percentile_fn(&graph.def_ranks);
438    let base_pct = make_percentile_fn(&graph.base_ranks);
439    let mut map = HashMap::new();
440    for (file_idx, file) in graph.files.iter().enumerate() {
441        for (def_idx, def) in file.defs.iter().enumerate() {
442            let flat = graph.def_offsets[file_idx] + def_idx;
443            if let Some(&rank) = graph.def_ranks.get(flat) {
444                let key = format!("{}::{}", file.path, def.name);
445                map.insert(key, def_pct(rank));
446            }
447        }
448        if file_idx < graph.base_ranks.len() {
449            map.insert(file.path.clone(), base_pct(graph.base_ranks[file_idx]));
450        }
451    }
452    map
453}
454
455/// Build a `value → percentile` function from a slice of rank values.
456///
457/// Sorts a copy once at build time, then each lookup is a binary search
458/// over the sorted slice. Returns the empirical CDF: the fraction of
459/// values strictly less than the queried value. Handles empty input
460/// and `NaN` defensively.
461fn make_percentile_fn(values: &[f32]) -> impl Fn(f32) -> f32 + '_ {
462    let mut sorted: Vec<f32> = values.iter().copied().filter(|v| v.is_finite()).collect();
463    sorted.sort_unstable_by(f32::total_cmp);
464    move |value: f32| {
465        if sorted.is_empty() {
466            return 0.0;
467        }
468        // partition_point returns the count of elements strictly less
469        // than `value` (because the predicate is `<`).
470        let count_below = sorted.partition_point(|&v| v < value);
471        #[expect(
472            clippy::cast_precision_loss,
473            reason = "rank counts well below f32 precision threshold"
474        )]
475        let pct = count_below as f32 / sorted.len() as f32;
476        pct
477    }
478}
479
480#[cfg(test)]
481mod tests {
482    use super::*;
483
484    #[test]
485    fn rrf_union_semantics() {
486        // sem: [0, 1, 2], bm25: [3, 0, 4]
487        // Chunk 0 appears in both lists → highest RRF score.
488        // Chunks 1, 2, 3, 4 appear in exactly one list → all five appear.
489        let sem = vec![(0, 0.9), (1, 0.8), (2, 0.7)];
490        let bm25 = vec![(3, 10.0), (0, 8.0), (4, 6.0)];
491
492        let fused = rrf_fuse(&sem, &bm25, 60.0);
493
494        let indices: Vec<usize> = fused.iter().map(|&(i, _)| i).collect();
495
496        // All 5 unique chunks must appear
497        for expected in [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] {
498            assert!(
499                indices.contains(&expected),
500                "chunk {expected} missing from fused results"
501            );
502        }
503        assert_eq!(fused.len(), 5);
504
505        // Chunk 0 must rank first (double-list bonus)
506        assert_eq!(indices[0], 0, "chunk 0 should rank first");
507    }
508
509    #[test]
510    fn rrf_single_list() {
511        // Only semantic results; BM25 is empty.
512        let sem = vec![(0, 0.9), (1, 0.8)];
513        let bm25: Vec<(usize, f32)> = vec![];
514
515        let fused = rrf_fuse(&sem, &bm25, 60.0);
516
517        assert_eq!(fused.len(), 2);
518        // Chunk 0 ranked first in sem list → higher RRF score than chunk 1
519        assert_eq!(fused[0].0, 0);
520        assert_eq!(fused[1].0, 1);
521        assert!(fused[0].1 > fused[1].1);
522    }
523
524    #[test]
525    fn search_mode_roundtrip() {
526        assert_eq!("hybrid".parse::<SearchMode>().unwrap(), SearchMode::Hybrid);
527        assert_eq!(
528            "semantic".parse::<SearchMode>().unwrap(),
529            SearchMode::Semantic
530        );
531        assert_eq!(
532            "keyword".parse::<SearchMode>().unwrap(),
533            SearchMode::Keyword
534        );
535
536        let err = "invalid".parse::<SearchMode>();
537        assert!(err.is_err(), "expected parse error for 'invalid'");
538        let msg = err.unwrap_err().to_string();
539        assert!(
540            msg.contains("invalid"),
541            "error message should echo the bad input"
542        );
543    }
544
545    #[test]
546    fn search_mode_display() {
547        assert_eq!(SearchMode::Hybrid.to_string(), "hybrid");
548        assert_eq!(SearchMode::Semantic.to_string(), "semantic");
549        assert_eq!(SearchMode::Keyword.to_string(), "keyword");
550    }
551
552    #[test]
553    fn pagerank_boost_amplifies_relevant() {
554        let chunks = vec![
555            CodeChunk {
556                file_path: "important.rs".into(),
557                name: "a".into(),
558                kind: "function".into(),
559                start_line: 1,
560                end_line: 10,
561                content: String::new(),
562                enriched_content: String::new(),
563            },
564            CodeChunk {
565                file_path: "obscure.rs".into(),
566                name: "b".into(),
567                kind: "function".into(),
568                start_line: 1,
569                end_line: 10,
570                content: String::new(),
571                enriched_content: String::new(),
572            },
573        ];
574
575        // Both start with same score; important.rs has high PageRank
576        let mut results = vec![(0, 0.8_f32), (1, 0.8)];
577        let mut pr = HashMap::new();
578        pr.insert("important.rs".to_string(), 1.0); // max PageRank
579        pr.insert("obscure.rs".to_string(), 0.1); // low PageRank
580
581        boost_with_pagerank(&mut results, &chunks, &pr, 0.3);
582
583        // important.rs should now rank higher
584        assert_eq!(
585            results[0].0, 0,
586            "important.rs should rank first after boost"
587        );
588        assert!(results[0].1 > results[1].1);
589
590        // Boost values reflect the sigmoid-on-percentile curve in
591        // `pagerank_boost_factor` (alpha=0.3 here):
592        // - percentile=1.0: sigmoid(3.33) ≈ 0.965, boost ≈ 1.29 → 1.032
593        // - percentile=0.1: sigmoid(-2.67) ≈ 0.065, boost ≈ 1.02 → 0.816
594        assert!(
595            (results[0].1 - 1.032).abs() < 0.01,
596            "rank=1.0 boost: expected ~1.032, got {}",
597            results[0].1
598        );
599        assert!(
600            (results[1].1 - 0.816).abs() < 0.01,
601            "rank=0.1 boost: expected ~0.816, got {}",
602            results[1].1
603        );
604    }
605
606    #[test]
607    fn pagerank_boost_zero_relevance_stays_zero() {
608        let chunks = vec![CodeChunk {
609            file_path: "important.rs".into(),
610            name: "a".into(),
611            kind: "function".into(),
612            start_line: 1,
613            end_line: 10,
614            content: String::new(),
615            enriched_content: String::new(),
616        }];
617
618        let mut results = vec![(0, 0.0_f32)];
619        let mut pr = HashMap::new();
620        pr.insert("important.rs".to_string(), 1.0);
621
622        boost_with_pagerank(&mut results, &chunks, &pr, 0.3);
623
624        // Zero score stays zero regardless of PageRank
625        assert!(results[0].1.abs() < f32::EPSILON);
626    }
627
628    #[test]
629    fn pagerank_boost_unknown_file_no_effect() {
630        let chunks = vec![CodeChunk {
631            file_path: "unknown.rs".into(),
632            name: "a".into(),
633            kind: "function".into(),
634            start_line: 1,
635            end_line: 10,
636            content: String::new(),
637            enriched_content: String::new(),
638        }];
639
640        let mut results = vec![(0, 0.5_f32)];
641        let pr = HashMap::new(); // empty — no PageRank data
642
643        boost_with_pagerank(&mut results, &chunks, &pr, 0.3);
644
645        // No PageRank data → no boost
646        assert!((results[0].1 - 0.5).abs() < f32::EPSILON);
647    }
648}