Module aws_sdk_mturk::types

source ·
Expand description

Data structures used by operation inputs/outputs.

Modules§

  • Builders
  • Error types that Amazon Mechanical Turk can respond with.

Structs§

  • The Assignment data structure represents a single assignment of a HIT to a Worker. The assignment tracks the Worker's efforts to complete the HIT, and contains the results for later retrieval.

  • An object representing a Bonus payment paid to a Worker.

  • The HIT data structure represents a single HIT, including all the information necessary for a Worker to accept and complete the HIT.

  • The HITLayoutParameter data structure defines parameter values used with a HITLayout. A HITLayout is a reusable Amazon Mechanical Turk project template used to provide Human Intelligence Task (HIT) question data for CreateHIT.

  • The Locale data structure represents a geographical region or location.

  • The NotificationSpecification data structure describes a HIT event notification for a HIT type.

  • When MTurk encounters an issue with notifying the Workers you specified, it returns back this object with failure details.

  • This data structure is the data type for the AnswerKey parameter of the ScoreMyKnownAnswers/2011-09-01 Review Policy.

  • Name of the parameter from the Review policy.

  • The Qualification data structure represents a Qualification assigned to a user, including the Qualification type and the value (score).

  • The QualificationRequest data structure represents a request a Worker has made for a Qualification.

  • The QualificationRequirement data structure describes a Qualification that a Worker must have before the Worker is allowed to accept a HIT. A requirement may optionally state that a Worker must have the Qualification in order to preview the HIT, or see the HIT in search results.

  • The QualificationType data structure represents a Qualification type, a description of a property of a Worker that must match the requirements of a HIT for the Worker to be able to accept the HIT. The type also describes how a Worker can obtain a Qualification of that type, such as through a Qualification test.

  • Both the AssignmentReviewReport and the HITReviewReport elements contains the ReviewActionDetail data structure. This structure is returned multiple times for each action specified in the Review Policy.

  • HIT Review Policy data structures represent HIT review policies, which you specify when you create a HIT.

  • Contains both ReviewResult and ReviewAction elements for a particular HIT.

  • This data structure is returned multiple times for each result specified in the Review Policy.

  • The WorkerBlock data structure represents a Worker who has been blocked. It has two elements: the WorkerId and the Reason for the block.

Enums§

  • When writing a match expression against AssignmentStatus, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against Comparator, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against EventType, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against HitAccessActions, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against HitReviewStatus, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against HitStatus, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against NotificationTransport, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against NotifyWorkersFailureCode, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against QualificationStatus, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against QualificationTypeStatus, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against ReviewActionStatus, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against ReviewPolicyLevel, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.
  • When writing a match expression against ReviewableHitStatus, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.