Module aws_sdk_cognitoidentityprovider::types
source · Expand description
Data structures used by operation inputs/outputs.
Modules§
- Builders
- Error types that Amazon Cognito Identity Provider can respond with.
Structs§
The data type for
AccountRecoverySetting
.Account takeover action type.
Account takeover actions type.
Configuration for mitigation actions and notification for different levels of risk detected for a potential account takeover.
The configuration for creating a new user profile.
The Amazon Pinpoint analytics configuration necessary to collect metrics for a user pool.
An Amazon Pinpoint analytics endpoint.
Specifies whether the attribute is standard or custom.
The authentication event type.
The authentication result.
The challenge response type.
The CloudWatch logging destination of a user pool detailed activity logging configuration.
The delivery details for an email or SMS message that Amazon Cognito sent for authentication or verification.
The compromised credentials actions type.
The compromised credentials risk configuration type.
Contextual user data type used for evaluating the risk of an unexpected event by Amazon Cognito advanced security.
The configuration for a custom domain that hosts the sign-up and sign-in webpages for your application.
The properties of a custom email sender Lambda trigger.
The properties of a custom SMS sender Lambda trigger.
The device-remembering configuration for a user pool. A DescribeUserPool request returns a null value for this object when the user pool isn't configured to remember devices. When device remembering is active, you can remember a user's device with a ConfirmDevice API request. Additionally. when the property
DeviceOnlyRememberedOnUserPrompt
istrue
, you must followConfirmDevice
with an UpdateDeviceStatus API request that sets the user's device toremembered
ornot_remembered
.The device verifier against which it is authenticated.
The device type.
A container for information about a domain.
The email configuration of your user pool. The email configuration type sets your preferred sending method, Amazon Web Services Region, and sender for messages from your user pool.
Specifies the user context data captured at the time of an event request.
Specifies the event feedback type.
The event risk type.
The group type.
The HTTP header.
A container for information about an IdP.
Specifies the configuration for Lambda triggers.
The logging parameters of a user pool.
The logging parameters of a user pool.
The message template structure.
This data type is no longer supported. Applies only to SMS multi-factor authentication (MFA) configurations. Does not apply to time-based one-time password (TOTP) software token MFA configurations.
The new device metadata type.
The notify configuration type.
The notify email type.
The minimum and maximum values of an attribute that is of the number data type.
The password policy type.
The properties of a pre token generation Lambda trigger.
A container for IdP details.
A container for information about an IdP for a user pool.
A map containing a priority as a key, and recovery method name as a value.
A resource server scope.
A container for information about a resource server for a user pool.
The risk configuration type.
The type of the configuration to override the risk decision.
A list of the user attributes and their properties in your user pool. The attribute schema contains standard attributes, custom attributes with a
custom:
prefix, and developer attributes with adev:
prefix. For more information, see User pool attributes.The SMS configuration type is the settings that your Amazon Cognito user pool must use to send an SMS message from your Amazon Web Services account through Amazon Simple Notification Service. To send SMS messages with Amazon SNS in the Amazon Web Services Region that you want, the Amazon Cognito user pool uses an Identity and Access Management (IAM) role in your Amazon Web Services account.
The SMS text message multi-factor authentication (MFA) configuration type.
The type used for enabling SMS multi-factor authentication (MFA) at the user level. Phone numbers don't need to be verified to be used for SMS MFA. If an MFA type is activated for a user, the user will be prompted for MFA during all sign-in attempts, unless device tracking is turned on and the device has been trusted. If you would like MFA to be applied selectively based on the assessed risk level of sign-in attempts, deactivate MFA for users and turn on Adaptive Authentication for the user pool.
The type used for enabling software token MFA at the user pool level.
The type used for enabling software token MFA at the user level. If an MFA type is activated for a user, the user will be prompted for MFA during all sign-in attempts, unless device tracking is turned on and the device has been trusted. If you want MFA to be applied selectively based on the assessed risk level of sign-in attempts, deactivate MFA for users and turn on Adaptive Authentication for the user pool.
The constraints associated with a string attribute.
The data type TokenValidityUnits specifies the time units you use when you set the duration of ID, access, and refresh tokens.
A container for the UI customization information for a user pool's built-in app UI.
The settings for updates to user attributes. These settings include the property
AttributesRequireVerificationBeforeUpdate
, a user-pool setting that tells Amazon Cognito how to handle changes to the value of your users' email address and phone number attributes. For more information, see Verifying updates to email addresses and phone numbers.Contextual data, such as the user's device fingerprint, IP address, or location, used for evaluating the risk of an unexpected event by Amazon Cognito advanced security.
The user import job type.
User pool add-ons. Contains settings for activation of advanced security features. To log user security information but take no action, set to
AUDIT
. To configure automatic security responses to risky traffic to your user pool, set toENFORCED
.The description of the user pool client.
Contains information about a user pool client.
A user pool description.
The policy associated with a user pool.
A container for information about the user pool.
A user profile in a Amazon Cognito user pool.
The username configuration type.
The template for verification messages.
Enums§
- When writing a match expression against
AccountTakeoverEventActionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
AdvancedSecurityModeType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
AliasAttributeType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
AttributeDataType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
AuthFlowType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
ChallengeName
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
ChallengeNameType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
ChallengeResponse
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
CompromisedCredentialsEventActionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
CustomEmailSenderLambdaVersionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
CustomSmsSenderLambdaVersionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
DefaultEmailOptionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
DeletionProtectionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
DeliveryMediumType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
DeviceRememberedStatusType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
DomainStatusType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
EmailSendingAccountType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
EventFilterType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
EventResponseType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
EventSourceName
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
EventType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
ExplicitAuthFlowsType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
FeedbackValueType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
IdentityProviderTypeType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
LogLevel
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
MessageActionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
OAuthFlowType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
PreTokenGenerationLambdaVersionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
PreventUserExistenceErrorTypes
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
RecoveryOptionNameType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
RiskDecisionType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
RiskLevelType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
StatusType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
TimeUnitsType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
UserImportJobStatusType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
UserPoolMfaType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
UserStatusType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
UsernameAttributeType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
VerifiedAttributeType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature. - When writing a match expression against
VerifySoftwareTokenResponseType
, it is important to ensure your code is forward-compatible. That is, if a match arm handles a case for a feature that is supported by the service but has not been represented as an enum variant in a current version of SDK, your code should continue to work when you upgrade SDK to a future version in which the enum does include a variant for that feature.